We performed a comparison between Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer and Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management.More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is ranked 8th in Application Requirements Management with 20 reviews while Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Requirements Management. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is rated 7.8, while Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer writes "Easy to use, beneficial test case visibility, and effective support". On the other hand, Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Jira, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, TFS and Sealights, whereas Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.