Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] and Parasoft Development Testing Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Requirements Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The most valuable feature is code coverage.
Top Answer:The solution's speed has room for improvement.
Top Answer:We use the Parasoft Development Testing Platform to verify code coverage for static analysis in our unit tests.
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Requirements Management
Views
100
Comparisons
77
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
217
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Borland Caliber
Parasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP
Learn More
Overview
Caliber (formerly Borland Caliber) is a complete requirements solution which ensures compliance and alignment of development to your business needs. Caliber facilitates stakeholder collaboration, rich visualization, robust management, and traceability of requirements to agile delivery plans. Deliver software with greater precision, less re-work, shorter release cycles, compliance with internal and external regulations, and improved customer satisfaction.

Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t.  Includes:

- Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards

- Preconfigured compliance reporting

- Customized Advanced Analytics

- Interactive Navigation of Results

- Traceability

Sample Customers
QinetiQ, Invertix Corporation, K.J. Ross & Associates, Siem Consub, Ministry of Defence _ France
General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Qualcomm, AAI Textron, Boeing, Fidelity, Johnson & Johnson, CIBC, Penske, Thales, Dell, 
Buyer's Guide
Application Requirements Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Requirements Management while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 10th in Application Requirements Management with 4 reviews. Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". Micro Focus Caliber [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer.

See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.