We performed a comparison between BotFarm and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution seems to offer high stability. We haven't seen any bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze."
"BotFarm is an easy solution to use and the interface is better than older versions."
"What I like most about BotFarm is that it's one of the leading RPA products in the market. Very few products focus on robotics today, so I like that BotFarm offers a lot in terms of what general customers expect it to do."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"They recently released the newest version that has a good program flow, quality, and blueprints that are all good improvements to the automation. They also have good integration with SAP."
"The system is stable and very little maintenance is required, assuming the bots process is perfectly designed."
"The most valuable features I have found to be the screen scraping and the integration with third-party solutions."
"It is easy to use and very stable. It is a rugged product, and it doesn't break so easily."
"The product saves time and resources."
"The most valuable feature is the robotic process."
"The solution is scalable."
"Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"This is a stable platform and we did not encounter any big problems."
"BotFarm newer version has been difficult to install, we have been in contact with the support on this matter."
"We have connectivity and integration with pretty much every single tech stack across the table that we have in the world, and there are a few areas that they don't do that well yet. I'd be looking for some improvement there, in terms of their integration with certain products."
"It would be ideal if the solution offered more language options, such as Arabic."
"The solution automation is incapable of interacting with our Pega software application development. It is based on the nested table concept and it is unable to read these tables. Several projects have been put on hold because of that."
"Sometimes I feel like it doesn't work properly and we are not able to provide the dexterity needed."
"When somebody is just learning this product it can be difficult for them to understand, so improvements to the user interface would be helpful."
"The new version is not very stable. Sometimes I can't use the recording sound."
"Normally we need to monitor the solution using an AWS console and the control room. We would like to have a standardized dashboard to see all the information in one place."
"The interface could be better from a usability standpoint."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."
"Exception handling needs to be improved."
"The product needs more AI capabilities."
"It needs a free training portal for anybody on the internet to use so that they can get an idea of what the possibilities are."
"Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular."
"This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release."
BotFarm is ranked 16th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 35 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. BotFarm is rated 8.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of BotFarm writes "Great feature sets, stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". BotFarm is most compared with Automation Anywhere (AA), UiPath and Blue Prism Cloud, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management. See our BotFarm vs. Tungsten RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
