Boundary [EOL] vs Hitachi JP1 Integrated Management [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boundary [EOL] and Hitachi JP1 Integrated Management [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, ServiceNow, Microsoft and others in Event Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed Event Monitoring Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Event Monitoring
Unranked
In Event Monitoring
Buyer's Guide
Event Monitoring
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, ServiceNow, Microsoft and others in Event Monitoring. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Hitachi JP1/Integrated Management, JP1, Hitachi IM
Learn More
Overview
Boundary's is 100% SaaS and gives organizations complete visibility across the entire IT operations and infrastructure irrespective of the underlying language and technology stack used, including public and private cloud architectures. Boundary's unique per-second application flow analysis (based on collecting all 'application chatter') is used to build a real-time application topology graph and add critical application dependency context to 3rd party events and notifications.

JP1/Integrated Management monitors your system from a single location to ensure that the entire system is problem-free. This product forms the base for integrated operations management. With JP1/Integrated Management, you can monitor environments both on-premises and in the cloud. Logs and information about the events that occur in the system can be collected to and monitored from a single location. In addition to events, you can also monitor business systems running on various platforms (including Windows, Linux, and UNIX), as well as the statuses of network devices, servers (processes and resources), and applications. Prevent important events from being overlooked by consolidating or suppressing large numbers of related events or by filtering to show only the events you are interested in. You can also perform advanced, efficient monitoring operations, such as changing which events are collected based on a given time frame and restricting the events that can be monitored by individual operators. If a failure occurs, JP1/Integrated Management automatically notifies the system administrator to ensure a rapid response.

Sample Customers
BeenVerified, BeenVerified, ClearCare, onePOS, Grasswire, InterviewStream, Leisure Loyalty Inc., Red Earth Systems, Avanxe
NEWTON Information Technology, Meitetsucom, Sumitomo Forestry
Buyer's Guide
Event Monitoring
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, ServiceNow, Microsoft and others in Event Monitoring. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Boundary [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Event Monitoring while Hitachi JP1 Integrated Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Event Monitoring. Boundary [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Hitachi JP1 Integrated Management [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Boundary [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Hitachi JP1 Integrated Management [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.