We performed a comparison between Box and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."Simple file sharing and sync for internal and external customers."
"The solution is scalable."
"The application is very light in terms of uploading and downloading files."
"Box is very user-friendly; more so than SharePoint."
"Sharing and collaborating across files and folders has been a massive game changer."
"Box is very realistic when it comes to sharing capabilities."
"The system's performance is impressive, and file sharing is notably straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Box is security."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"Improvements in speed - Box's high level of security impacts performance, especially when compared with other similar services."
"The search features and role permissions are not very user friendly. It only searches the first few pages of a document, which is quite a problem."
"Like all cloud platforms, there are always areas of improvement around sync to local devices."
"If you want to delete something in Box, you have to do it manually, one by one. That was my recent experience. They might have a bulk delete, but I could not find that option. If you want to delete something, you have to go to each and every file and delete it."
"If there was a plugin that added some sort of toolbar in Office, that would be great."
"They could integrate better with other platforms."
"I haven't really come across a case where we're not able to use it for what it is, so I don't really have anything holding us up or any customers holding us up at this point that I know of. There are always some limitations, but as a technologist, I just live with them, and there is always room for improvement, but I don't have anything quantifiable."
"Data privacy, regarding where to store your data: Offering several transparent(!) options (where to store my data and whether to sync back or not and where to sync) regarding the local law situations (USA, EU, Switzerland!) would increase the credibility of a US based company (after NSA ‘snooping’)."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
Box is ranked 4th in Enterprise Content Management with 37 reviews while Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. Box is rated 8.4, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Box writes "Used for data storage and data collaboration, but its data security could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". Box is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Citrix ShareFile, Office 365 and Egnyte, whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors and best Document Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
