We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Box Logo
Read 7 Box reviews.
7,459 views|6,058 comparisons
Oracle WebCenter Logo
2,665 views|2,154 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Box vs. Oracle WebCenter and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The first thing that we liked about this solution is that administrators do not have access to private folders.""The application is very light in terms of uploading and downloading files.""The interface is very good.""Box is very user-friendly; more so than SharePoint.""We've never had a penetration. We've never had a security issue that their support didn't solve. We love their audit trail. We can know exactly when a collaborator opens. We love how you can define a collaborator.""Governance and ease of use are why I think a lot of people like Box, including ourselves. Basically, we're concerned about what information is being sent to Box, so we use a lot of the Box governance features to make sure that what is being sent to Box is appropriate. If it is not appropriate, it is not allowed to be sent. It is also pretty easy to use. It is the easiest to use for customers and for technologists.""Box is very realistic when it comes to sharing capabilities."

More Box Pros »

"You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server.""Integration within the solution is very good."

More Oracle WebCenter Pros »

Cons
"I would like to see improvements made in the ability to integrate with other online sharing systems.""Better integration with other solutions is needed.""The integration with other products should be improved.""The UI should be faster. Sometimes it lags when switching between documents.""I recommend doing the trial first, because it's not cheap ware. It's not overly expensive, but it's not cheap ware, and enterprise has a minimum number of users.""I haven't really come across a case where we're not able to use it for what it is, so I don't really have anything holding us up or any customers holding us up at this point that I know of. There are always some limitations, but as a technologist, I just live with them, and there is always room for improvement, but I don't have anything quantifiable.""If there was a plugin that added some sort of toolbar in Office, that would be great."

More Box Cons »

"The speed of the backup should be enhanced.""The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product."

More Oracle WebCenter Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing of this solution is better than Dropbox.""I believe Box is cheaper than SharePoint.""They are very price competitive when pushed. Initially, they come out with a standard list price, but they are willing to be very competitive. The Box price was pretty much equal to or lower than the Citrix price, and Box has more features.""There's a free version that allows you to use it with almost full-feature access. Even in the free version, it gives you all you need."

More Box Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Box is very realistic when it comes to sharing capabilities.
Top Answer: I use the free version. It provides me with all of the features that I need.
Top Answer: I believe there is still a desktop version; I used to use it in the past. If it's still in use, there should be a Microsoft Office plugin because most of the shareable documents are generated… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
7,459
Comparisons
6,058
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
568
Rating
8.3
Views
2,665
Comparisons
2,154
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
558
Rating
8.8
Comparisons
Also Known As
WebCenter, FatWire
Learn More
Overview
Box is a Modern Content Management Platform for companies of all sizes and industries. The difference that Box brings is that it offers the security and controls admins need with the sharing and collaboration capabilities end users want. Since 2005, Box has made it easier for people to securely share ideas, collaborate and get work done faster. Today, more than 43 million users and 62,000 businesses--including 59% of the Fortune 500--trust Box to manage content in the cloud. The Box platform provides HIPAA, FINRA, FedRAMP, and many other compliances to go with granular access permissions and advanced security capabilities. By using Box you can sync, share, and collaborate on all types of files, anywhere, on any device - but that's just the beginning. You can choose where to store your data, to manage your own encryption keys, and set workflows to automate content-based processes. You can also assign custom metadata tags to content, watermark sensitive content, and set file retention or legal hold policies. Box has deep, native integrations with Microsoft Office and Outlook, Google Apps for Work, Salesforce, Netsuite, Docusign, Adobe, and many other best-of-breed solutions you may already be using.

Oracle WebCenter is the center of engagement for business powering exceptional experiences for customers, partners, and employees. It connects people, processes, and information with the most complete portfolio of portal, content management, Web experience management, and collaboration technologies. 

Offer
Learn more about Box
Learn more about Oracle WebCenter
Sample Customers
GE, Toyota, P&G, Caterpillar, Flex, Schneider Electric, Sally Beauty, Eurostar, AstraZeneca, AirBnB, Whirlpool, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Nationwide, Aeropostale etc
Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Jagran Prakashan Ltd., Standard Forwarding LLC, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., INSO sistemi per le infrastrutture sociali S.p.A., Helsana Versicherungen AG, ArRiyadh Development Authority, John Lewis Partnership, Arqiva, SURUGADAI EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, Portuguese Official Agriculture and Fisheries
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Non Tech Company30%
University11%
Financial Services Firm11%
Construction Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government9%
Manufacturing Company7%
REVIEWERS
Pharma/Biotech Company25%
Marketing Services Firm13%
Transportation Company13%
Comms Service Provider13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company46%
Insurance Company10%
Comms Service Provider7%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business28%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise49%
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise64%
Find out what your peers are saying about Box vs. Oracle WebCenter and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Box is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 7 reviews while Oracle WebCenter is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. Box is rated 8.2, while Oracle WebCenter is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Box writes "Good folder privacy allows us to responsibly share files between departments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Has the ability to move workloads in between sub-servers but the backups should be faster ". Box is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Citrix ShareFile, OpenText Content Suite Platform and Office 365, whereas Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content and Experience Cloud, SharePoint, WebLogic Suite, IBM FileNet and Adobe Experience Manager. See our Box vs. Oracle WebCenter report.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.