We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiNAC and Impulse Point SafeConnect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."Fortinet FortiNAC has good user account customization."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiNAC is compliance, which we can do with the clients and the endpoints on the network."
"There are some features that are working well."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiNAC are access control, automation, artificial intelligence, analysis, and security, and it is a unified solution. You can combine a lot of features within the solution."
"It effectively addresses issues arising from endpoint connections to the network, contributing to an enhanced overall security solution for our clients."
"The most valuable aspect of Fortinet FortiNAC is the control it offers."
"The ease of deployment is valuable."
"Fortinet FortiNAC offers several valuable features, including data security, 99 percent uptime with VPN connections, MAC filtering, and traffic prioritization."
"It is very easy to scale the product."
"The user interface and the product's intuitiveness could be improved."
"For our organization and our clients, the price is the main concern. They should work to make it more competitive."
"The GUI is a little bit strange — different than other Fortinet products."
"This solution could be more agile."
"We have some stability issues with the solution, the network drops out too often."
"The deployment of Fortinet FortiNAC could be better. When we are deploying the solution we have some level of dependencies with other vendors for their connection to Fortinet FortiNAC. Without these dependencies, it would be better."
"Technical support could improve their response times."
"There could be better integration with legacy equipment. It integrates perfectly with all Fortinet solutions, but if you look at other third-party integrations—not on the networking part; but more on the security infrastructure part—it's more limited."
"The solution would be much better if it offered self-service onboarding."
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 3rd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 43 reviews while Impulse Point SafeConnect is ranked 17th in Network Access Control (NAC). Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6, while Impulse Point SafeConnect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Impulse Point SafeConnect writes "Easy to scale, enforces policies well, and has responsive technical support". Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Fortinet FortiClient, whereas Impulse Point SafeConnect is most compared with Forescout Platform.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.