We performed a comparison between ExtremeControl and Fortinet FortiNAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."I can know which end users are using which features."
"The company also uses Cisco ISE in other places. I have been told that ExtremeControl is easier to use than ISE. The other reason we prefer ExtremeControl is stability. That's why they chose it for this big hospital in Oslo."
"There is information on migrating most of the cloud system's features."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to protect devices connected to network service."
"Fortinet FortiNAC is a stable solution."
"Fortinet FortiNAC has good user account customization."
"The ease of deployment is valuable."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the user-friendliness, the graphical interface, and the technical support. The interface is very nice and the customization is good."
"It is a good product."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiNAC is compliance, which we can do with the clients and the endpoints on the network."
"Compared to other NAC vendors, Fortinet’s user interface is more user-friendly."
"I'd like to have access to more information on the traffic passing through."
"The installation is easy, it can take between five minutes to four hours depending on the complexity of the environment. The speed of the installation could improve for more complex environments."
"There isn't enough development for the on-premises controller."
"The product must make its UI similar to other Fortinet products."
"FortiNAC could be more scalable."
"The interface works fine, but it could be better."
"The reporting capability needs to be improved."
"The user interface and the product's intuitiveness could be improved."
"Fortinet's local support could be improved."
"The product could be more user-friendly in terms of GUI."
"The course content could be improved, it's not that simple to work through."
ExtremeControl is ranked 11th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 4 reviews while Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 3rd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 43 reviews. ExtremeControl is rated 8.2, while Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ExtremeControl writes "It costs less than comparable solutions, and it's highly stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". ExtremeControl is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Forescout Platform, whereas Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Sophos Network Access Control.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.