We performed a comparison between Brinqa and IBM OpenPages based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities."
"The ability to keep a record of internal incidents in the company, and also the monitoring of Key Indicators."
"The product’s interface is very intuitive."
"The content, reporting, and workflow features stand out as the most valuable aspects."
"Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision."
"I believe there's room for improvement in establishing connections with external information."
"The solution must allow customization in reporting."
"IBM OpenPages needs improvement in its UI. Currently, it is difficult to see the relationships (associations/parents) between all items unless you click on the item itself."
Brinqa is ranked 11th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while IBM OpenPages is ranked 8th in GRC with 5 reviews. Brinqa is rated 7.0, while IBM OpenPages is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Brinqa writes "Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM OpenPages writes "Enables us to manage global workflow and users' relationships with the links". Brinqa is most compared with Vulcan Cyber, Axonius, Nucleus, Avalor and Tenable Nessus, whereas IBM OpenPages is most compared with RSA Archer, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, SAP BusinessObjects GRC and AuditBoard.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
