Brinqa vs McAfee ToPS [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Brinqa Logo
332 views|219 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
McAfee Logo
views| comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Brinqa and McAfee ToPS [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities.
Top Answer:I would rate the costliness of the solution at a seven out of ten. It is on the expensive side and there are some additional fees.
Top Answer:Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision. We felt they were somewhat slow in assisting us in maturing our processes. Additionally, we encountered some… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
332
Comparisons
219
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
746
Rating
7.0
Unranked
In Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Comparisons
Vulcan Cyber logo
Compared 18% of the time.
Axonius logo
Compared 15% of the time.
Nucleus logo
Compared 10% of the time.
Avalor logo
Compared 10% of the time.
Tenable Nessus logo
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
ToPS, Intel Security ToPS
Learn More
Overview
Brinqa GRC provides a pluggable set of building blocks for meeting your IT process governance, risk management, and compliance reporting needs.
Enables automated pricing and lien management, ticket management, driver tracking and provides detailed management reports.
Sample Customers
Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (TTUHSC)
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Computer Software Company13%
Insurance Company9%
Retailer8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise78%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Brinqa is ranked 11th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while McAfee ToPS [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Brinqa is rated 7.0, while McAfee ToPS [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Brinqa writes "Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs". On the other hand, Brinqa is most compared with Vulcan Cyber, Axonius, Nucleus, Avalor and Tenable Nessus, whereas McAfee ToPS [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.