We performed a comparison between Brinqa and Nexthink based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities."
"Although limited to 100,000,000 events per engine, it is suffice to do investigations for more than 30 days."
"The auto building capability has been most valuable. It keeps on checking the system in terms of various factors like battery, memory usage and application usage."
"It is useful for managing end-user devices. The insights and the data that you get from end-user devices are most valuable."
"Performance-wise, Nexthink is very good, and with each version, it is improved."
"The solution has reduced the time it takes to resolve issues."
"Nexthink saves a lot of time for the technicians who work on the troubleshooting side...Nexthink provides its users with a very good point of overview and presentation."
"The search engine functionality that Nexthink has on the finder is terrific."
"Nexthink allows our customers to have visibility into their whole environment and security. And it lets you install the agent as a package for selected users instead of every user. This helps cut down on the delay involved in a bulk installation."
"Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision."
"They can improve the Nexthink action module."
"Nexthink could have better integration with ITSM tools - at the moment, they only integrate with ServiceNow, so adding other tools, like HP SMAX, would be very useful."
"The next release could use some improvement in the tools that are provided."
"The solution could use better automation and less coding. Since I am part of the administrative background, I'm not completely into the development side. I'm not well versed in coding."
"It would be good to have a more controlled way to access their cloud environment."
"I would like it if they could put in some patch deployments and compliances."
"We would like better connectivity with SCCM for on-premises infrastructure and autopilot for cloud deployment."
"In our company, we can't deploy anything from Nexthink the way we can deploy from any other endpoint solutions. It is not possible to create any dashboard in Nexthink...One should be able to schedule monitoring in Nexthink."
Brinqa is ranked 11th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Nexthink is ranked 1st in DEM - Digital Experience Monitoring with 20 reviews. Brinqa is rated 7.0, while Nexthink is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Brinqa writes "Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nexthink writes " A monitoring tool that helps save the time of its users with its features while offering a reasonable amount of stability and scalability". Brinqa is most compared with Vulcan Cyber, Axonius, Nucleus, Tenable Nessus and Tenable Security Center, whereas Nexthink is most compared with SysTrack, ControlUp, Alluvio Aternity , Liquidware Stratusphere UX and ConnectWise Automate.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.