• Home
  • Brinqa vs. Galvanize HighBond

Brinqa vs Galvanize HighBond comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Brinqa Logo

Brinqa

Read 1 Brinqa review
332 views|219 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Galvanize Logo

Galvanize HighBond

Read 3 Galvanize HighBond reviews
1,289 views|797 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Brinqa and Galvanize HighBond based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Remo Belisari
Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs
Brinqa has made a big difference in our organization. It helps us focus on managing risks effectively and increases our awareness of potential... Read more →
WillWillis
Good automation and analytics, but is costly
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities."

More Brinqa Pros →

"The most valuable feature is automation."

More Galvanize HighBond Pros →

Cons
"Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision."

More Brinqa Cons →

"The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement."

More Galvanize HighBond Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I give the cost of the solution a six out of ten."

    • More Galvanize HighBond Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Brinqa?
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities.
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Brinqa?
    Top Answer:I would rate the costliness of the solution at a seven out of ten. It is on the expensive side and there are some additional fees.
    What needs improvement with Brinqa?
    Top Answer:Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision. We felt they were somewhat slow in assisting us in maturing our processes. Additionally, we encountered some… more »
    What do you like most about Galvanize HighBond?
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is automation.
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Galvanize HighBond?
    Top Answer:Regarding pricing, we are located in Africa where economic instability prevails and our currency continues to lose value due to inflation. The cost of the solution is high. I give the cost of the… more »
    What needs improvement with Galvanize HighBond?
    Top Answer:The report model was our main concern. I believe currently the solution uses a third party for the reporting. As part of a consulting firm, one of the challenges we face is the difficulty in producing… more »
    Ranking
    11th
    out of 37 in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
    Views
    332
    Comparisons
    219
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    746
    Rating
    7.0
    9th
    out of 86 in GRC
    Views
    1,289
    Comparisons
    797
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    489
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Vulcan Cyber logo
    Vulcan Cyber vs. Brinqa
    Compared 18% of the time.
    Axonius logo
    Axonius vs. Brinqa
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Nucleus logo
    Nucleus vs. Brinqa
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Avalor logo
    Avalor vs. Brinqa
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Tenable Nessus logo
    Tenable Nessus vs. Brinqa
    Compared 10% of the time.
    More Brinqa Competitors   →
    ACL Analytics logo
    ACL Analytics vs. Galvanize HighBond
    Compared 85% of the time.
    RSA Archer logo
    RSA Archer vs. Galvanize HighBond
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Workiva Wdesk logo
    Workiva Wdesk vs. Galvanize HighBond
    Compared 6% of the time.
    More Galvanize HighBond Competitors   →
    Also Known As
    Rsam GRC, HighBond, HighBond by Galvanize
    Learn More
    Brinqa
    Galvanize
    Overview
    Brinqa GRC provides a pluggable set of building blocks for meeting your IT process governance, risk management, and compliance reporting needs.
    Your GRC program is unique to your organization - and Rsam thinks it should stay that way. We give you control over what modules you want to implement and in what order. Deploy an out-of-the-box, turnkey baseline configuration that addresses your most urgent use case within 30 days and iterate from there. With Rsam, you can also easily customize the baseline configuration to meet your own unique needs. Iterate each step of the way until you reach 100% of your requirements. This keeps your implementation manageable and moving forward.
    Sample Customers
    Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation
    CNA Insurance
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Insurance Company9%
    Retailer8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization43%
    Government8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise78%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise48%
    Large Enterprise42%
    Buyer's Guide
    Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Brinqa is ranked 11th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Galvanize HighBond is ranked 9th in GRC with 3 reviews. Brinqa is rated 7.0, while Galvanize HighBond is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Brinqa writes "Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Galvanize HighBond writes "Good automation and analytics, but is costly". Brinqa is most compared with Vulcan Cyber, Axonius, Nucleus, Avalor and Tenable Nessus, whereas Galvanize HighBond is most compared with ACL Analytics, RSA Archer and Workiva Wdesk.

    We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.