Compare Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Cognizant ADPART

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Cognizant ADPART? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Recommendation is to go with concurrent licenses as oppose to seat license; this gives more flexibility."

More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
9th
Views
3,687
Comparisons
1,423
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
752
Rating
7.7
17th
Views
2,031
Comparisons
807
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
Grid Tools Agile Designer, CA ARD, CA Agile Requirements Designer ADPART
Learn
Broadcom
Cognizant
Overview
CA Agile Requirements Designer is an end-to-end requirements gathering, test automation and test case design tool which drastically reduces manual testing effort and enables organizations to deliver quality software to market earlier and at less cost. The optimal set of manual or automated tests can be derived automatically from requirements modeled as unambiguous flowcharts and are linked to the right data and expected results. These tests are updated automatically when the requirements change, allowing organizations to deliver quality software which reflects changing user needs.

Cognizant ADPART is a Model-based testing product that enables organization get their products business ready 30% faster and ensure 100% quality coverage. 

ADPART lets users model business flows and automates test design eliminating the need for manual authoring of test cases. 

Offer
Learn more about Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Learn more about Cognizant ADPART
Sample Customers
Williams, Rabobank
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm58%
Energy/Utilities Company17%
Comms Service Provider17%
Manufacturing Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Energy/Utilities Company19%
Comms Service Provider10%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business5%
Large Enterprise95%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is ranked 9th in Test Management Tools with 2 reviews while Cognizant ADPART is ranked 17th in Test Management Tools. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is rated 7.6, while Cognizant ADPART is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer writes "Elimiates requirements gaps early in the developemnt process & make test desing process more efficient ". On the other hand, Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is most compared with Jira, Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, IBM Rational DOORS and Conformiq, whereas Cognizant ADPART is most compared with Tricentis qTest, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Tricentis Tosca, TFS and Conformiq.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors and best Test Design Automation vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.