Compare Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Silk Central

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Recommendation is to go with concurrent licenses as oppose to seat license; this gives more flexibility."

More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
7th
Views
3,088
Comparisons
1,209
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
759
Rating
9.0
20th
Views
1,000
Comparisons
531
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Grid Tools Agile Designer, CA ARD, CA Agile Requirements Designer
Borland Silk Central, Micro Focus Silk Central
Learn More
Overview
CA Agile Requirements Designer is an end-to-end requirements gathering, test automation and test case design tool which drastically reduces manual testing effort and enables organizations to deliver quality software to market earlier and at less cost. The optimal set of manual or automated tests can be derived automatically from requirements modeled as unambiguous flowcharts and are linked to the right data and expected results. These tests are updated automatically when the requirements change, allowing organizations to deliver quality software which reflects changing user needs.
Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.
Offer
Learn more about Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Learn more about Silk Central
Sample Customers
Williams, Rabobank
AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm58%
Energy/Utilities Company17%
Comms Service Provider17%
Manufacturing Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider12%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm25%
Transportation Company25%
Manufacturing Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Financial Services Firm24%
Comms Service Provider10%
Insurance Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business5%
Large Enterprise95%
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise70%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: June 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is ranked 7th in Test Management Tools with 1 review while Silk Central is ranked 20th in Test Management Tools. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is rated 9.0, while Silk Central is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer writes "Eliminates requirements gaps early in the development process & make test design process more efficient ". On the other hand, Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is most compared with Cognizant ADPART, Jira, Tricentis Tosca, IBM Rational DOORS and Conformiq, whereas Silk Central is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Zephyr Enterprise, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, TestRail by Gurock and Tricentis qTest.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors and best Test Design Automation vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.