Compare Broadcom Clarity PPM vs. Planisware

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Clarity PPM Logo
7,052 views|3,350 comparisons
Planisware Logo
1,591 views|833 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Broadcom Clarity PPM? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: August 2020.
438,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
438,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
7,052
Comparisons
3,350
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
391
Avg. Rating
10.0
Views
1,591
Comparisons
833
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,626
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
Clarity PPM, CA Clarity, CA PPM, CA Clarity PPM
Learn
Broadcom
Planisware
Video Not Available
Overview
CA PPM represents a single platform that enables you to manage your entire innovation lifecycle and make more informed strategic investments. CA PPM helps you track and prioritize market and customer requirements and make better decisions on how to invest limited resources, so you can optimize your enterprise, IT, service and product portfolio. Further, it offers the unified, comprehensive project management capabilities you need to deliver quality initiatives on time and on budget. Available via SaaS, on-premise, and hosted delivery models.Resource and cost scheduling, time tracking, risk and document management in a collaborative environment. Software solution that supports the end-to-end governance of company portfolios, from finance and resource planning, to the life cycle management of products.
Offer
Learn more about Broadcom Clarity PPM
Learn more about Planisware
Sample Customers
Toyota Financial Services, GameStop, Polycom, Sky, Qantas, Cox Enterprises, Banco Mercantil, BorealisApotex, Alstom Transport, HP, Stryker, Rexam, Jotun, Gelita, Kraton Performance Polymers, Abbvie, Rio Tinto Alcan, Maruho, Teva, SK Chemicals
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm27%
Manufacturing Company12%
Insurance Company10%
Healthcare Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Media Company10%
Comms Service Provider9%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Pharma/Biotech Company11%
Construction Company7%
Comms Service Provider5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: August 2020.
438,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Broadcom Clarity PPM is ranked 2nd in Project Portfolio Management with 2 reviews while Planisware is ranked 7th in Project Portfolio Management with 1 review. Broadcom Clarity PPM is rated 9.0, while Planisware is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Clarity PPM writes "Technically sound, very user friendly, with good support provided". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Planisware writes "Scales capably, flexiby for even complex, long-term, R&D programs and provides single-source-of-data-truth integration. SaaS is optional. ". Broadcom Clarity PPM is most compared with Jira, Microsoft Project Server, ServiceNow IT Business Management, Planview Enterprise One and JIRA Portfolio, whereas Planisware is most compared with Microsoft Project Server, Planview Enterprise One, Jira, SAP Portfolio and Project Management and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.