We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the XFlow, that interface is pretty cool."
"The interfaces for project management, portfolio management, and reporting services are always helpful."
"It's very good out of the box, without configurations required."
"The solution is technically fine and user friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the portfolio functionality because we have the ability to work with different scenarios and many kinds of financial management. We can integrate with ERP, and with other solutions from third-party vendors. The financial model in Broadcom Clarity PPM, it's the most valuable aspect."
"It's a very easy-to-use and flexible tool. We can easily write and create queues for different themes. It's very user-friendly."
"The solution could improve the way the workflow is developed. I think they could be more dynamic because they are in a way static. They're very powerful, but they don't have any interaction with end-users."
"Could be using more updated technologies."
"In terms of what could be improved, the end user interface could be improved to be more intuitive, because we sometimes have issues with customization. Sometimes we are not able to customize everything for the end user's interface, and they require more customization. We should be able to perform a deeper customization here."
"The user interface (UI) needs to be improved. Right now, it's not the best."
"In the future, I would like to see integrated Agile features and better integration with Agile tools."
"On one side, it's very easy to create a task with text, but on the other side, it's not very well-formatted. Therefore, it's difficult to track specific data written in a task. We are making templates, but it's not enough to use a template to know the exact status of different tasks. One thing that we are looking for in Wrike is a better workflow. Because we can only move the status of tasks, we can't really manage workflow and send a task to a specific person. This is what is really missing in Wrike as compared to other tools. We are looking to replace Wrike because we need support for workflow. Another issue with Wrike is that they bring a lot of versions of the tool, which it's not so easy. They bring new versions very frequently, and these versions look similar. For example, we are using robots to read the tasks in the tools, which is problematic with Wrike because it is changing very frequently."
"Wrike is not so expensive, but I don't know exactly how it compares with other tools. Wrike might not be so cheap when we are using it for a lot of users."
Earn 20 points
Wrike is an online collaboration and project management software bringing together centralized task management and social collaboration features into one real-time workspace. It connects tasks, discussions, and emails to your actual project plan. You get an up-to-date picture of the project and can keep your team aligned with your strategy without boring status meetings. Challenges Wrike helps solve:
Broadcom Clarity PPM is ranked 4th in Project Management Software with 7 reviews while Wrike is ranked 15th in Project Management Software with 1 review. Broadcom Clarity PPM is rated 9.0, while Wrike is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Clarity PPM writes "Strong tool with many available components". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wrike writes "Flexible and easy-to-use but lacks real workflow support and tasks management feature". Broadcom Clarity PPM is most compared with ServiceNow IT Business Management, Planview Enterprise One, Jira, Microsoft Project Server and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, whereas Wrike is most compared with Trello, Asana, Project.net, monday.com and ProofHub.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.