Compare Broadcom MACH5 vs. Ipanema IpIengine

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom MACH5 Logo
11 views|0 comparisons
Ipanema IpIengine Logo
478 views|418 comparisons
Ranking
17th
out of 17 in WAN Optimization
Views
11
Comparisons
0
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
11th
out of 17 in WAN Optimization
Views
478
Comparisons
418
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Cato Networks, Citrix, GFI and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2021.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
IpIengine
Learn More
Ipanema Technologies
Video Not Available
Overview

MACH5 with Asymmetrical Caching technology extends well beyond other WAN optimizers, which focus on symmetrical data caching and acceleration. You can use MACH5’s specialized WAN optimization features for data, video, cloud and web applications, in IPv4, IPv6 or mixed environments. Combining its asymmetrical caching capability with the patent-pending CachePulse™ cloud-enabled intelligence services, the MACH5 is uniquely formulated to deliver outstanding results for WAN acceleration and user experience in today’s cloud and web 2.0 environment.

The Ipanema Autonomic Networking System (ANS) uses both software and hardware components. The fully featured hardware components are called ip|engines. These devices are installed within the customer VPN at edge locations, typically between a CPE router and the LAN. Requiring no specific local configuration except an IP address, an ip|engine is a self-managed and cooperative device that operates under the control of the ANS central management software, called SALSA. Each ip|engine acts as a local point of control within ANS. ip|engines work collectively in real-time to discover the applications and measure the network's performance and usage ip|engine. As part of ANS, the ip|engines cooperate and tune themselves automatically to the dynamic nature of the application traffic, globally enforcing the Application SLAs. They take into account meshed flows, different types of congestion, application competition for resources and so on. The ip|engines adapt to longer term changes within the business, such as a change in the distribution of users across sites, a newly deployed application or a new site, as well as the evolution of infrastructure and services into the cloud.

Offer
Learn more about Broadcom MACH5
Learn more about Ipanema IpIengine
Sample Customers
State Bank of India, Coty, Intellinet, Hill International
Valeo, KBC, Henkel, Bouygues Telecom, Gemalto, VDABês, Globus, EADS, faurecia, Fiat, Renault Nissan, Safran, Valeo, Volvo, Aviva, Visa, L'Oreal, Hasbro, Moet & Chandon Champagne
Find out what your peers are saying about Cato Networks, Citrix, GFI and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2021.
476,483 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Broadcom MACH5 is ranked 17th in WAN Optimization while Ipanema IpIengine is ranked 11th in WAN Optimization. Broadcom MACH5 is rated 0.0, while Ipanema IpIengine is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Broadcom MACH5 is most compared with , whereas Ipanema IpIengine is most compared with Riverbed Steelhead, Citrix SD-WAN and WAAS.

See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.