Broadcom MACH5 vs Ipanema IpIengine comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
20 views|8 comparisons
Ipanema Technologies Logo
72 views|31 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Broadcom MACH5 and Ipanema IpIengine based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
15th
out of 15 in WAN Optimization
Views
20
Comparisons
8
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
11th
out of 15 in WAN Optimization
Views
72
Comparisons
31
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
IpIengine
Learn More
Broadcom
Video Not Available
Ipanema Technologies
Video Not Available
Overview

MACH5 with Asymmetrical Caching technology extends well beyond other WAN optimizers, which focus on symmetrical data caching and acceleration. You can use MACH5’s specialized WAN optimization features for data, video, cloud and web applications, in IPv4, IPv6 or mixed environments. Combining its asymmetrical caching capability with the patent-pending CachePulse™ cloud-enabled intelligence services, the MACH5 is uniquely formulated to deliver outstanding results for WAN acceleration and user experience in today’s cloud and web 2.0 environment.

The Ipanema Autonomic Networking System (ANS) uses both software and hardware components. The fully featured hardware components are called ip|engines. These devices are installed within the customer VPN at edge locations, typically between a CPE router and the LAN. Requiring no specific local configuration except an IP address, an ip|engine is a self-managed and cooperative device that operates under the control of the ANS central management software, called SALSA. Each ip|engine acts as a local point of control within ANS. ip|engines work collectively in real-time to discover the applications and measure the network's performance and usage ip|engine. As part of ANS, the ip|engines cooperate and tune themselves automatically to the dynamic nature of the application traffic, globally enforcing the Application SLAs. They take into account meshed flows, different types of congestion, application competition for resources and so on. The ip|engines adapt to longer term changes within the business, such as a change in the distribution of users across sites, a newly deployed application or a new site, as well as the evolution of infrastructure and services into the cloud.

Sample Customers
State Bank of India, Coty, Intellinet, Hill International
Valeo, KBC, Henkel, Bouygues Telecom, Gemalto, VDABês, Globus, EADS, faurecia, Fiat, Renault Nissan, Safran, Valeo, Volvo, Aviva, Visa, L'Oreal, Hasbro, Moet & Chandon Champagne
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Broadcom MACH5 is ranked 15th in WAN Optimization while Ipanema IpIengine is ranked 11th in WAN Optimization. Broadcom MACH5 is rated 0.0, while Ipanema IpIengine is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ipanema IpIengine writes "We like the Dynamic WAN selection and Dynamic QoS. It's important to select the right device at the start". Broadcom MACH5 is most compared with , whereas Ipanema IpIengine is most compared with .

See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.