We performed a comparison between Broadcom Payment Security and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."I use this product to extract cases from there and then send it to Ops to review and analyze."
"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and"
"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics."
"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."
"In terms of the fraud that we see on the card site, card not present fraud, the person gives contribution to what the total fraud has increased substantially."
"The solution loads big data efficiently and quickly."
"The solution is easier to set up, configure, and use than other products."
"The core engine seems to be better than the rest for pattern recognition. It is able to process large amounts of data."
"The most valuable feature is the designer, which allows us to connect to UI and build things directly, such as creating a platform with our synchronizing policy manager rules, without any additional requirements."
"It's a very good product for compliance and transaction monitoring for anti-money laundering."
"I like the tracking methodology. Though it was implemented on-premises, the compliance is compatible with it. It will have certain modifications with RPM and APR. It has good exposure from a compliance point of view."
"The case management tool is user friendly."
"The solution user-friendly interactive, informative and it is also very light."
"I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works."
"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."
"The service is improving with the implementation of 3D Secure 2.0."
"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."
"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising."
"From the front end side, the UI is definitely user-friendly. It is highly compatible as long as the reading is at the coding point of view. But it can't provide certain high coding. When a person clicks on any kind of scenario or alert, I would like to have a metadata help menu."
"I would say — Actimize is not being moved forward by Nice."
"Licensing costs are high compared to other products in the market."
"This solution is unnecessarily complex."
"The solution needs to mitigate and provide an update for one listener process that keeps failing."
"Sometimes when we move from one version to another, a few things don't work as expected."
"It has become too complex for its own good with a lot of versions. They are trying to do too much. Instead of keeping it sort of traditional and keeping the core search engine as a standalone and having analytical bolt-ons, they have decided to jam it all into the same product, which made the product overly complex and difficult to implement."
"Processes don't function when front end is down."
More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Broadcom Payment Security is ranked 23rd in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 1st in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 17 reviews. Broadcom Payment Security is rated 8.8, while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Broadcom Payment Security writes "Versatility in rule variables allows for customization and optimization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Highly intelligent and effective for detecting fraud in transactions". Broadcom Payment Security is most compared with Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS), whereas Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, ThreatMetrix and Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
