Compare Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. Micro Focus Service Virtualization

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Françoise Dough
User-friendly, flexible, and saves us in development time
In short, we are able to save a lot of valuable time. Testers and developers no longer complain about not having access to dependent services. We... Read more »
Use Micro Focus Service Virtualization? Share your opinion.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable features include the capability to use other program languages such as PLSQR, JAVA, .NET.""The ability to create virtual services and deploy them as Docker containers, and include them in our Jenkins build pipelines, is a valuable feature.""The most valuable features are the recording and creating of virtual services.""There are several areas that are easily configurable."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Pros »

"The feature which is most valuable in this solution is the ease of use. The product is very easy to use and very easy to implement."

More Micro Focus Service Virtualization Pros »

Cons
"UI should be more user friendly: better usability, more testing oriented.""The workstation component has a very out-dated UI and is in dire need of a facelift.""It is not a stable solution.""I would like to have more flexibility towards the mainframe virtualization and also in JDBC virtualization."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Cons »

"The current protocol needs to be updated to be much more flexible. The product needs more technical flexibility in implementation and customization."

More Micro Focus Service Virtualization Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support.""I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Micro Service Virtualization is very expensive. The pricing of this product is in line with all of the other big name-brand products."

More Micro Focus Service Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st
out of 6 in Service Virtualization
Views
5,076
Comparisons
1,815
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
696
Rating
8.3
5th
out of 6 in Service Virtualization
Views
1,147
Comparisons
441
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
1,018
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
+ Add more products to compare
+ Add more products to compare
Also Known As
ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization HPE Service Virtualization
Learn
Broadcom
Micro Focus
Overview

CA Service Virtualization acts as a catalyst for DevOps by simulating constrained or unavailable systems across the software development lifecycle (SDLC). This allows developers, testers and performance teams to work in parallel to accelerate app delivery, as well as to “shift-left” the app testing to improve application quality. CA Service Virtualization was previously known as LISA, the product from the ITKO acquisition.

Micro Focus Service Virtualization helps to simulate a services behavior in a production environment. This simulation software enables in-house development and testing teams to keep to their schedules regardless of access to production systems.

Offer
Learn more about Broadcom Service Virtualization
Learn More
Learn more about Micro Focus Service Virtualization
Learn More
Sample Customers
Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, Virgin Media, TTNet
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Comms Service Provider20%
Transportation Company7%
Retailer7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company48%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider12%
Energy/Utilities Company4%
REVIEWERS
Retailer22%
Financial Services Firm22%
Media Company22%
Consumer Goods Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider10%
Insurance Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business4%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise89%
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise67%

Broadcom Service Virtualization is ranked 1st in Service Virtualization with 4 reviews while Micro Focus Service Virtualization is ranked 5th in Service Virtualization with 1 review. Broadcom Service Virtualization is rated 8.2, while Micro Focus Service Virtualization is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Service Virtualization writes "Scalable with good recording and creating of virtual services, but it's not stable and there is no support for previous versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Virtualization writes "Easy to use, easy to implement, and it helps us to identify problems and create resolutions". Broadcom Service Virtualization is most compared with Parasoft Service Virtualization, SmartBear ServiceV Pro, Tricentis Tosca, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server and SoapUI Pro, whereas Micro Focus Service Virtualization is most compared with Parasoft Service Virtualization and SmartBear ServiceV Pro.

See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors.

We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.