Compare Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. Micro Focus UFT One

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable features include the capability to use other program languages such as PLSQR, JAVA, .NET.""The ability to create virtual services and deploy them as Docker containers, and include them in our Jenkins build pipelines, is a valuable feature.""The most valuable features are the recording and creating of virtual services.""There are several areas that are easily configurable."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Pros »

"UFT has improved our ability to regression test.""This product is easy to use, understand, and maintain.""The production and the efficiency of making your test cases can be very high.""The solution has good out-of-the-box protocols.""The interface is fine and there is nothing else to add in terms of enhancement.""The initial setup is relatively easy.""On a scale of one to ten, I would give Micro Focus UFT One a 10 because it is a reliable product, it works, it's as good or better than similar solutions especially because you get technical support from real people. Additionally, upgrades are always provided on a consistent basis."

More Micro Focus UFT One Pros »

Cons
"UI should be more user friendly: better usability, more testing oriented.""The workstation component has a very out-dated UI and is in dire need of a facelift.""It is not a stable solution.""I would like to have more flexibility towards the mainframe virtualization and also in JDBC virtualization."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Cons »

"It could work with more browsers other than Internet Explorer, and could better handle new things like Ext JS.""One of the drawbacks is that mobile performance testing is in need of improvement.""The price is very high. They should work to lower the costs for their clients.""Technical support could be improved.""We have had some issues with stability, where it crashes sometimes.""The overall design needs an entire overhaul. We prefer software designed to ensure the package isn't too loaded.""They need to reduce the cost because it is pretty high. It's approximately $3,000 per user."

More Micro Focus UFT One Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support.""I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."

More Micro Focus UFT One Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Glad to see your post!! In the recent Microfocus version does Microfocus one UFT integration possible with Jira. If so How it is possible and how effective it is?
Top Answer: Any updates on this @Don Ingerson. I am trying to pre-assess the same question. Whether I would get any performance improvements in executing scripts (VBScripts) in UFT 14.XX or UFT 15.XX compared to… more »
Top Answer: Definitely OATS is an ideal tool for automation of oracle applications Oracle Fusion is developed using Oracle ADF and the open script has the add-in of Oracle Fusion for Fusion applications.… more »
Ranking
1st
Views
5,076
Comparisons
1,815
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
696
Rating
8.3
3rd
Views
23,021
Comparisons
14,777
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
736
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
Broadcom
Micro Focus
Overview

CA Service Virtualization acts as a catalyst for DevOps by simulating constrained or unavailable systems across the software development lifecycle (SDLC). This allows developers, testers and performance teams to work in parallel to accelerate app delivery, as well as to “shift-left” the app testing to improve application quality. CA Service Virtualization was previously known as LISA, the product from the ITKO acquisition.

Micro Focus UFT One simplifies end-to-end functional testing using intelligent test automation and embedded AI-based capabilities to accelerate testing across web, mobile, desktop, mainframe, API, and composite and packaged enterprise-grade apps.

QA and Testing teams can efficiently scale tests across distributed infrastructures and in parallel on web and mobile; script once and replay all tests with cross-browser support; and leverage a broad ecosystem of integrations from version control to continuous integration to agile and DevOps.

With support of 200+ technologies including SAP, Salesforce, Java, Citrix and more, UFT One increases test coverage from the UI to the API—and everything in between—for true multi-platform application testing.

Micro Focus UFT One is also known as Unified Functional Testing, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP).

Offer
Learn more about Broadcom Service Virtualization
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT One
Sample Customers
Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil,  Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Comms Service Provider20%
Transportation Company7%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company48%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider12%
Energy/Utilities Company4%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm28%
Insurance Company17%
Healthcare Company17%
Retailer10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm7%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business4%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise89%
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise92%

Broadcom Service Virtualization is ranked 1st in Service Virtualization with 4 reviews while Micro Focus UFT One is ranked 3rd in Functional Testing Tools with 9 reviews. Broadcom Service Virtualization is rated 8.2, while Micro Focus UFT One is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Broadcom Service Virtualization writes "Scalable with good recording and creating of virtual services, but it's not stable and there is no support for previous versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT One writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Broadcom Service Virtualization is most compared with Micro Focus Service Virtualization, Parasoft Service Virtualization, SmartBear ServiceV Pro, Tricentis Tosca and Selenium HQ, whereas Micro Focus UFT One is most compared with Micro Focus UFT Developer, Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete, Silk Test and Katalon Studio.

See our list of .

We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.