"We are able to quickly scale our requests. We have tested across thousands of requests. We have had no problems so far."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"It is definitely scalable."
"The most valuable features include the capability to use other program languages such as PLSQR, JAVA, .NET."
"Ability to vary the responses very easily (randomize, pick-lists, etc.)."
"There are several areas that are easily configurable."
"It's got probably the greatest amount of features, in terms of different technologies that you can automate and virtualize, out of any of the solutions out there."
"The ability to create virtual services and deploy them as Docker containers, and include them in our Jenkins build pipelines, is a valuable feature."
"It supports most of the actions that a user would do on a website."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Selenium HQ's most valuable feature is its online community support, which is comprehensive and easy to access."
"It is compatible with and supports multiple languages, such as Java and Python. It is open source, and it is widely used."
"The stability of the solution has been good, it is reliable we have not had any bugs."
"The solution is very flexible; there are different ways of using it. It's open-source and has a lot of support on offer."
"Its biggest advantage is that it is very customizable."
"The most valuable feature of Selenium HQ is it provides support for third-party tools, such as screenshots, and automates Windows-based applications."
"The workstation component has a very out-dated UI and is in dire need of a facelift."
"DevTest is pretty massive. It's hard to tell what different parts of it can be used to do different things. They should modulize it more."
"I really want to see more of the "express" kind of model, where you get a little bit for free. I'd love to be able to see you be able to edit and author tests without having to be connected to a licensed server. And then, if you want to go and execute tests, then you go and connect to the server... I think it would unblock people to be able to do a lot more work from home or from remote places, where they can't really connect to the server."
"From a reporting perspective I think we would like to have a more user-friendly approach."
"Needs some additional lightweight, portable elements."
"UI should be more user friendly: better usability, more testing oriented."
"One major feature I would like to see is on the user administration part. Right now, anybody can access any of the folders and any of the projects."
"More examples of portal-based virtualization."
"They should leverage the tools for supporting Windows apps."
"If they can integrate more recording features, like UFT, it would be helpful for automation, but it's not necessary. They can also add a few more reporting features for advanced reporting."
"For now, I guess Selenium could add some other features like object communications for easy expansion."
"One drawback to Selenium is that there is nothing like an object repository, such as that found in QTP, especially considering continuous integration practices that have become common nowadays."
"They should add more functionality to the solution."
"I would like for the next release to support parallel testing."
"It would be better if we could use it without having the technical skills to run the scripting test."
"Selenium has been giving us failures sometimes. It is not working one hundred percent of the time when we are creating elements. They need to improve the stability of the solution."
More Broadcom Service Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice →
Broadcom Service Virtualization is ranked 1st in Service Virtualization with 97 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 102 reviews. Broadcom Service Virtualization is rated 8.2, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Service Virtualization writes "Feature-rich, easy to configure and set up, and the support is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Continuously being developed and large community makes it easy to find solutions". Broadcom Service Virtualization is most compared with ReadyAPI Test, Parasoft Virtualize, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server, OpenText Service Virtualization and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Telerik Test Studio, Worksoft Certify, Tricentis Tosca and OpenText Silk Test.
We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.