Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Virtualization comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Broadcom Service Virtualization and ReadyAPI Virtualization based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, OpenText, SmartBear and others in Service Virtualization.
To learn more, read our detailed Service Virtualization Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"You can create virtual services from a live recording or convert raw traffic into request/response pairs.""Scalability has actually worked well and we are able to bring it to multiple environments.""Easy to understand ways of creating stubs.""CA Service Virtualization has helped us advance the development cycle when third-party interfaces are not available to us.""We had a number of back-end services that were not available during testing times. What this had allowed us to do is get our early life testing done while those services are not available.""In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, there was a device terminal, which was interacting with the application via the TCP/IP protocol. Most of the tools don't support that, but we were able to achieve it using Broadcom Service Virtualization.""You can have a lot of different people with different technologies use the tool, without any programming experience at all, all the way up to people who can program. And then, the more technical that you are, the more programming you have, the more you're able to customize the tool.""There are several areas that are easily configurable."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Pros →

"Discovery option to create virtual services.""The technical support is good.""In times of DevOps, where continuous delivery and deployment is progressing at such a fast pace, ServiceV Pro has emerged as an add-on for enhancing our API product finish.""Ties-in with the rest of the SoapUI platform and its ability to record traffic and create a virtual endpoint.""Features, such as using Groovy scripts for generating dynamic response, which read data out of Excel sheets and one-click deployment are really nice.""The solution is very easy to use.""ServiceV Pro enabled our organization to deliver an end-to-end solution by virtualizing external systems, which was easy to implement and provided for a lot of flexibility."

More ReadyAPI Virtualization Pros →

Cons
"DevTest is pretty massive. It's hard to tell what different parts of it can be used to do different things. They should modulize it more.""Needs some additional lightweight, portable elements.""It is not a stable solution.""UI should be more user friendly: better usability, more testing oriented.""​From a reporting perspective I think we would like to have a more user-friendly approach.""We had to implement an external service catalog. We put it in ServiceNow. I would like to see an integrated service catalog.""The workstation component has a very out-dated UI and is in dire need of a facelift.""I'd like to see more of the newer technologies included in there, looking mainly from a mobile perspective, possibly, so you can virtualize some of the aspects that we're going to be doing for mobile testing."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Cons →

"The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman.""It needs support for a wider set of protocols.""Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings.""Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users.""ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present.""The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements"

More ReadyAPI Virtualization Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
  • "There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
  • "I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
  • "There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
  • More Broadcom Service Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is alright, however more options would be desirable for a fairly new product like ServiceV."
  • "Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."
  • "Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."
  • "This product is worth the cost."
  • More ReadyAPI Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, there was a device terminal, which was interacting with the application via the TCP/IP protocol. Most of the… more »
    Top Answer:There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five.
    Top Answer:The cost is an area that needs improvement. There are a couple of other tools which provide support for performance testing with the base version itself, but Broadcom needs a separate component to… more »
    Top Answer:The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman. The overall picture the solution provides could use additional enhancements.
    Top Answer:The solution handles APIs differently than Postman, so get familiar with it before you use it. I recommend the solution and rate it a seven out of ten.
    Ranking
    1st
    Views
    821
    Comparisons
    378
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    358
    Rating
    9.0
    3rd
    Views
    233
    Comparisons
    109
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    288
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
    ServiceV Pro
    Learn More
    Overview

    CA Service Virtualization acts as a catalyst for DevOps by simulating constrained or unavailable systems across the software development lifecycle (SDLC). This allows developers, testers and performance teams to work in parallel to accelerate app delivery, as well as to “shift-left” the app testing to improve application quality. CA Service Virtualization was previously known as LISA, the product from the ITKO acquisition.

    API virtualization in ServiceV Pro helps you deliver great APIs on time and under budget, and does so for a fraction of the cost typically associated with traditional enterprise service virtualization suites.

    Sample Customers
    Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
    Zurich Insurance Group
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Transportation Company7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Insurance Company16%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise88%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise78%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise84%
    Buyer's Guide
    Service Virtualization
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, OpenText, SmartBear and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Broadcom Service Virtualization is ranked 1st in Service Virtualization with 97 reviews while ReadyAPI Virtualization is ranked 3rd in Service Virtualization with 7 reviews. Broadcom Service Virtualization is rated 8.2, while ReadyAPI Virtualization is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Broadcom Service Virtualization writes "Feature-rich, easy to configure and set up, and the support is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReadyAPI Virtualization writes "Good RESTful API support and performs well, but customization is difficult and time-consuming". Broadcom Service Virtualization is most compared with ReadyAPI Test, Parasoft Virtualize, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server, OpenText Service Virtualization and Tricentis Tosca, whereas ReadyAPI Virtualization is most compared with OpenText Service Virtualization and Orchestrated Service Virtualization.

    See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors.

    We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.