Compare Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. SmartBear ServiceV Pro

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. SmartBear ServiceV Pro and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable features include the capability to use other program languages such as PLSQR, JAVA, .NET.""The ability to create virtual services and deploy them as Docker containers, and include them in our Jenkins build pipelines, is a valuable feature.""The most valuable features are the recording and creating of virtual services.""There are several areas that are easily configurable."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Pros »

"Ties-in with the rest of the SoapUI platform and its ability to record traffic and create a virtual endpoint.""In times of DevOps, where continuous delivery and deployment is progressing at such a fast pace, ServiceV Pro has emerged as an add-on for enhancing our API product finish."

More SmartBear ServiceV Pro Pros »

Cons
"UI should be more user friendly: better usability, more testing oriented.""The workstation component has a very out-dated UI and is in dire need of a facelift.""It is not a stable solution.""I would like to have more flexibility towards the mainframe virtualization and also in JDBC virtualization."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Cons »

"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings.""The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements"

More SmartBear ServiceV Pro Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support.""I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution.""Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."

More SmartBear ServiceV Pro Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st
Views
5,076
Comparisons
1,815
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
696
Rating
8.3
2nd
Views
962
Comparisons
465
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
449
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization ServiceV Pro
Learn
Broadcom
SmartBear
Overview

CA Service Virtualization acts as a catalyst for DevOps by simulating constrained or unavailable systems across the software development lifecycle (SDLC). This allows developers, testers and performance teams to work in parallel to accelerate app delivery, as well as to “shift-left” the app testing to improve application quality. CA Service Virtualization was previously known as LISA, the product from the ITKO acquisition.

API virtualization in ServiceV Pro helps you deliver great APIs on time and under budget, and does so for a fraction of the cost typically associated with traditional enterprise service virtualization suites.

Offer
Learn more about Broadcom Service Virtualization
Learn more about SmartBear ServiceV Pro
Sample Customers
Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, Zurich Insurance Group
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Comms Service Provider20%
Transportation Company7%
Retailer7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company48%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider12%
Energy/Utilities Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider9%
Hospitality Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business4%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise89%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. SmartBear ServiceV Pro and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Broadcom Service Virtualization is ranked 1st in Service Virtualization with 4 reviews while SmartBear ServiceV Pro is ranked 2nd in Service Virtualization with 2 reviews. Broadcom Service Virtualization is rated 8.2, while SmartBear ServiceV Pro is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Service Virtualization writes "Scalable with good recording and creating of virtual services, but it's not stable and there is no support for previous versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear ServiceV Pro writes "It has the capability to extend its features for the execution of our APIs ". Broadcom Service Virtualization is most compared with Micro Focus Service Virtualization, Parasoft Service Virtualization, Tricentis Tosca, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server and SoapUI Pro, whereas SmartBear ServiceV Pro is most compared with Parasoft Service Virtualization, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server and Micro Focus Service Virtualization. See our Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. SmartBear ServiceV Pro report.

See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors.

We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.