Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable features include the capability to use other program languages such as PLSQR, JAVA, .NET."
"The ability to create virtual services and deploy them as Docker containers, and include them in our Jenkins build pipelines, is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are the recording and creating of virtual services."
"There are several areas that are easily configurable."
"The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, it's easy to use and easy to teach to others."
"The interface is user-friendly."
"The solution offers excellent integration capabilities."
"It's a very simple solution to use."
"UI should be more user friendly: better usability, more testing oriented."
"The workstation component has a very out-dated UI and is in dire need of a facelift."
"It is not a stable solution."
"I would like to have more flexibility towards the mainframe virtualization and also in JDBC virtualization."
"We tried automation but it's not easy to integrate with the synching and some of the mission tools that we use for automated testing of APIs."
"The documentation needs to be improved because the interface is not easy for a first-time user."
"Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better."
"If the load and bare minimum could be defined, I would give this solution a higher rating."
Pricing and Cost Advice
"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"The cost is not that bad."
"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."
Questions from the Community
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: The interface is user-friendly.
Top Answer: The documentation needs to be improved because the interface is not easy for a first-time user. It would be better if the price of this solution was lowered.
out of 6 in Service Virtualization
Average Words per Review
out of 44 in Functional Testing Tools
Average Words per Review
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 45% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Also Known As
|ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization||SoapUI NG Pro|
CA Service Virtualization acts as a catalyst for DevOps by simulating constrained or unavailable systems across the software development lifecycle (SDLC). This allows developers, testers and performance teams to work in parallel to accelerate app delivery, as well as to “shift-left” the app testing to improve application quality. CA Service Virtualization was previously known as LISA, the product from the ITKO acquisition.
|For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.|
Learn more about Broadcom Service Virtualization
Learn more about SoapUI Pro
|Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil,||Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler|
Financial Services Firm25%
Comms Service Provider20%
Computer Software Company48%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm23%
Consumer Goods Company8%
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm7%
Broadcom Service Virtualization is ranked 1st in Service Virtualization with 4 reviews while SoapUI Pro is ranked 8th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews. Broadcom Service Virtualization is rated 8.2, while SoapUI Pro is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Broadcom Service Virtualization writes "Scalable with good recording and creating of virtual services, but it's not stable and there is no support for previous versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SoapUI Pro writes "An open source solution for mocking, load testing and developing". Broadcom Service Virtualization is most compared with Micro Focus Service Virtualization, Parasoft Service Virtualization, SmartBear ServiceV Pro, Tricentis Tosca and Orchestrated Service Virtualization, whereas SoapUI Pro is most compared with ReadyAPI, Postman, Parasoft SOAtest, Apache JMeter and Micro Focus UFT One.
See our list of .
We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.