Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
821 views|378 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
SmartBear Logo
1,409 views|1,169 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Broadcom Service Virtualization and ReadyAPI Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, OpenText, SmartBear and others in Service Virtualization.
To learn more, read our detailed Service Virtualization Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We are able to quickly scale our requests. We have tested across thousands of requests. We have had no problems so far.""It is definitely scalable.""The most valuable features include the capability to use other program languages such as PLSQR, JAVA, .NET.""The most valuable features are the recording and creating of virtual services.""I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable.""Unit testing or early life testing did not have to be stopped or delayed because those services were not available.""In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, there was a device terminal, which was interacting with the application via the TCP/IP protocol. Most of the tools don't support that, but we were able to achieve it using Broadcom Service Virtualization.""There are several areas that are easily configurable."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Pros →

"The Pro and free version of SoapUI Pro has good technical support.""The solution offers excellent integration capabilities.""ReadyAPI has the power to enrich all the technical work. You can achieve any complex task using ReadyAPI. I can also do UI automation with ReadyAPI. In a few test cases, we want to check the API and the equivalent UI. I download a job and write a piece of Groovy or Java code. It's almost the same in ReadyAPI. I can do that in a single test case. ReadyAPI is a powerful tool because you can do anything you want, but only you need to download the right set of jobs and produce the right set of code.""The solution has some good scanning features.""We used to write our own solutions, from small scripts to task web services, so this saves us thousands of hours.""It's a very simple solution to use.""The utmost importance lies in the performance of the application.""One good feature is SoapUI's URL check, which allows you to check among the applications. I'm not just talking about the ones for Android. It has all kinds of multi-world tests that are really helpful."

More ReadyAPI Test Pros →

Cons
"I would rate the tech support a nine out of ten. They need more knowledge about the connectivity to DevOps orchestration.""More examples of portal-based virtualization.""CA actually releases a new version every year. We had issues with the upgrade prior to the latest one.""I would like to have more flexibility towards the mainframe virtualization and also in JDBC virtualization.""The workstation component has a very out-dated UI and is in dire need of a facelift.""It is not a stable solution.""They can always work on usability and making simple things simple to do. This is true of every product that deals with complexity.""Needs some additional lightweight, portable elements."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Cons →

"Automation features are not user-friendly.""We tried automation but it's not easy to integrate with the synching and some of the mission tools that we use for automated testing of APIs.""Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better.""If the load and bare minimum could be defined, I would give this solution a higher rating.""ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution.""The current interface is unsatisfactory.""Could integrate the graphing module for load testing.""Occasionally, when you are saving, the solution can hang."

More ReadyAPI Test Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
  • "There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
  • "I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
  • "There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
  • More Broadcom Service Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost is not that bad."
  • "I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."
  • "My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."
  • "The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."
  • "We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."
  • "SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."
  • "ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."
  • "It is free of charge."
  • More ReadyAPI Test Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, there was a device terminal, which was interacting with the application via the TCP/IP protocol. Most of the… more »
    Top Answer:There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five.
    Top Answer:The cost is an area that needs improvement. There are a couple of other tools which provide support for performance testing with the base version itself, but Broadcom needs a separate component to… more »
    Top Answer:The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on.
    Top Answer:ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten.
    Top Answer:ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    Views
    821
    Comparisons
    378
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    358
    Rating
    9.0
    15th
    Views
    1,409
    Comparisons
    1,169
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
    SoapUI NG Pro
    Learn More
    Overview

    CA Service Virtualization acts as a catalyst for DevOps by simulating constrained or unavailable systems across the software development lifecycle (SDLC). This allows developers, testers and performance teams to work in parallel to accelerate app delivery, as well as to “shift-left” the app testing to improve application quality. CA Service Virtualization was previously known as LISA, the product from the ITKO acquisition.

    For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.
    Sample Customers
    Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
    Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Transportation Company7%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Retailer7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Logistics Company11%
    Security Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Insurance Company10%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise88%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise78%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise74%
    Buyer's Guide
    Service Virtualization
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, OpenText, SmartBear and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: March 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Broadcom Service Virtualization is ranked 1st in Service Virtualization with 97 reviews while ReadyAPI Test is ranked 15th in Functional Testing Tools with 31 reviews. Broadcom Service Virtualization is rated 8.2, while ReadyAPI Test is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Service Virtualization writes "Feature-rich, easy to configure and set up, and the support is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReadyAPI Test writes "Has out-of-the-box database support and can be easily used by non-technical staff ". Broadcom Service Virtualization is most compared with Parasoft Virtualize, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server, OpenText Service Virtualization and Tricentis Tosca, whereas ReadyAPI Test is most compared with Postman, ReadyAPI, Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One and Apigee.

    We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.