Broadcom Storage Management for Mainframe vs CA 1 Tape Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Broadcom Storage Management for Mainframe and CA 1 Tape Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, IBM, NetApp and others in Storage Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Storage Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Broadcom Storage Management for Mainframe?
Beyza Aksöz
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Storage Management solutions are best for your needs.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The solution is stable.
Top Answer:The solution's pricing could be better.
Ranking
18th
out of 26 in Storage Management
Views
86
Comparisons
73
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
7th
out of 26 in Storage Management
Views
402
Comparisons
244
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
167
Rating
10.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
BrightStor Tape Management
Learn More
Broadcom
Video Not Available
Overview

Get the Most Out of Your Storage Media Investments
Storage Management for Mainframe solutions from CA Technologies are designed to help maintain a high level of data availability and protection across the enterprise. Our solutions support the industry’s broadest range of storage platforms including IBM®, EMC, Hitachi Data Systems (HDS), Oracle (StorageTek™) and others. Manage these platforms using a consistent interface without the need to learn multiple niche utilities.

CA 1 Tape Management (CA 1) is designed to simplify and unify the management and protection of z/OS tape data sets and volumes. It automates day-to-day z/OS tape management tasks to save your organization time and money. It enables a higher level of integrity for tape data while providing comprehensive protection against the inadvertent destruction of tape files. CA 1 helps you maintain data integrity, providing tools to continually check your data and prevent overwriting. To give you greater control, a Web-based Graphical Management Interface streams detailed tape volume information and provides a common platform for more efficient management practices.

Sample Customers
Blue Hill, AlphaServe, InnovaPost
TravelPort, AlphaServe, Rogers Communication
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm25%
Insurance Company22%
Computer Software Company11%
Government11%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise4%
Large Enterprise75%
Buyer's Guide
Storage Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, IBM, NetApp and others in Storage Management. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Broadcom Storage Management for Mainframe is ranked 18th in Storage Management while CA 1 Tape Management is ranked 7th in Storage Management with 6 reviews. Broadcom Storage Management for Mainframe is rated 0.0, while CA 1 Tape Management is rated 9.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA 1 Tape Management writes "An easy-to-use solution with good technical support services". Broadcom Storage Management for Mainframe is most compared with , whereas CA 1 Tape Management is most compared with CA TLMS Tape Management (CA TLMS), CA Allocate DASD Space and Placement, CA Vtape Virtual Tape System (CA Vtape) and IBM Spectrum Control.

See our list of best Storage Management vendors.

We monitor all Storage Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.