Compare BrowserStack vs. mabl

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BrowserStack Logo
5,600 views|4,826 comparisons
mabl Logo
209 views|161 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This solution costs less than competing products.""The price is fine."

More BrowserStack Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I like that it offers full device capability.
Top Answer: Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
14th
Views
5,600
Comparisons
4,826
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
602
Rating
8.3
37th
Views
209
Comparisons
161
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

Mabl is the leading intelligent test automation platform built for Agile teams. It’s the only SaaS solution that tightly integrates automated end-to-end testing into the entire development lifecycle. With mabl creating, executing, and maintaining reliable tests has never been easier, allowing software teams to increase test coverage, speed up development and improve application quality.

Offer
Learn more about BrowserStack
Learn more about mabl
Sample Customers
Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG
Arch Insurance Group, Internet Travel Solutions, CareerBuilder, LOB, Building Engines, MaestroQA, TeamLeader, Piece of Cake
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm11%
Insurance Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise43%
Large Enterprise43%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BrowserStack is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews while mabl is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools. BrowserStack is rated 8.4, while mabl is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Test against a huge range of device and browser combinations but expect some connectivity issues". On the other hand, BrowserStack is most compared with Perfecto, Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting, LambdaTest and Tricentis Tosca, whereas mabl is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Functionize and Micro Focus UFT One.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.