Compare BrowserStack vs. Micro Focus UFT Mobile

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2021.
534,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials.""Testing across devices and browsers without maintaining that inventory is invaluable.""The product guides and resources are extensive and very helpful.""Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development.""I like that it offers full device capability.""It just added some flexibility. There was nothing that improved our coding standards, etc. because all of our UIs were functional before we tried it."

More BrowserStack Pros »

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

More Micro Focus UFT Mobile Pros »

Cons
"I would like for there to be more integration with BrowserStack and other platforms.""Connectivity can sometimes mar the testing experience.""Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product.""Adding better integration with frameworks, particularly testing frameworks like Robot, would be of more value to customers and make their jobs easier."

More BrowserStack Cons »

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

More Micro Focus UFT Mobile Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This solution costs less than competing products.""The price is fine."

More BrowserStack Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
534,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I like that it offers full device capability.
Top Answer: Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product.
Top Answer: I can talk about UFT Mobile and its use for managing mobile farm devices.  You can execute manual testing and it's integrated with other testing tools from Micro Focus such as: - UFT developer -… more »
Ranking
14th
Views
5,600
Comparisons
4,826
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
602
Rating
8.3
27th
Views
1,812
Comparisons
1,161
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
369
Rating
6.7
Comparisons
Also Known As
Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center
Learn More
Overview
BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

Micro Focus UFT Mobile amplifies team productivity by providing a centralized, enterprise-level, end-to-end lab and management gateway of distributed real mobile devices and emulators that helps teams develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize their omnichannel mobile applications to promote an enhanced user experience across all digital touchpoints. Testers and Developers alike can validate all aspects of the mobile user experience including functionality, performance, and security using services simulations and network virtualization. UFT Mobile supports continuous testing and drives continuous improvement and optimization by analyzing availability and performance of mobile application via production monitoring.

Offer
Learn more about BrowserStack
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT Mobile
Sample Customers
Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG
Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider12%
Insurance Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise43%
Large Enterprise43%
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise69%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2021.
534,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BrowserStack is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while Micro Focus UFT Mobile is ranked 27th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review. BrowserStack is rated 8.0, while Micro Focus UFT Mobile is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Test against a huge range of device and browser combinations but expect some connectivity issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT Mobile writes "Easy to use and has good virtualization capability". BrowserStack is most compared with Perfecto, Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting and LambdaTest, whereas Micro Focus UFT Mobile is most compared with Appium, Micro Focus UFT One, Experitest, AWS Device Farm and Silk Test.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.