Built.io Flow Embed [EOL] vs Talend Stitch ETL comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Software AG Logo
views| comparisons
Talend Logo
284 views|218 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Built.io Flow Embed [EOL] and Talend Stitch ETL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Data Integration Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Built.io Flow Embed [EOL]?
Radovan Bacovic
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Stitch for us is ease of use. This solution is fire-and-forget. All an organization has to do is set up the connection or integration and move on.
Top Answer:Generally speaking, support is a pain point. In the next release, I would love to see a change in support from the current chat to a more comprehensive portal. I would also like to see more exotic… more »
Top Answer:Our primary use case for Stitch is tax and targets extraction. I am not familiar with any other feature of Stitch.
Ranking
Unranked
In Cloud Data Integration
16th
Views
284
Comparisons
218
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
654
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Stitch
Learn More
Software AG
Video Not Available
Overview

Built.io Flow™ Embed is a cloud-based embedded integration engine designed to enable your users to easily connect and integrate data from over 190 systems, apps, and devices from within your application experience.

Through a simple-to-configure form, your users are able to access more data - quicker - while you retain full control over their integration experience and abilities.

Because it is based on Built.io Flow, your engineering team can focus on building differentiated content and let the infrastructure and maintenance be handled by us. This means faster time-to-market with less maintenance and more features for your end users.

Stitch is a cloud ETL service that replicates data from more than 90 applications and databases and Looker is a powerful business intelligence and data analytics platform. To get the most out of Looker, data needs to be consolidated into a data warehouse that Looker can easily access.

Sample Customers
Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings
AB InBev, Accolade, Accor, AstraZeneca, Beachbody
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company17%
Financial Services Firm11%
Real Estate/Law Firm8%
Retailer8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise66%
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Data Integration
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Built.io Flow Embed [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cloud Data Integration while Talend Stitch ETL is ranked 16th in Cloud Data Integration with 1 review. Built.io Flow Embed [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Talend Stitch ETL is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Talend Stitch ETL writes "Fire-and-forget solution with a great infrastructure". Built.io Flow Embed [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Talend Stitch ETL is most compared with Talend Open Studio and AWS Glue.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.