We performed a comparison between webMethods Integration Server and webMethods.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today."
"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is the built-in monitoring, auditing, RETS, and SOAP services."
"The product is very stable."
"It’s fairly easy to view, move, and mange access across different components. Different component types are categorized and can be viewed in a web based administration console."
"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."
"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."
"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."
"Broker and UM are the best features."
"EDI is robust and integration with SAP is good."
"The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation."
"A while ago, they were hacked, and it took them a very long time to open their website again in order to download any service packs or any features. I don't know what they could do differently. I know that they were vulnerable, and there was some downtime, but because they were down, we were unable to download any potential service packs."
"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."
"The product must add more compatible connectors."
"For code version control, you need to use some external software."
"It is quite expensive."
"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."
"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."
"I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."
"webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience."
"Scalability and connectors to different cloud applications is lacking."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews while webMethods.io is ranked 18th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 2 reviews. webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0, while webMethods.io is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io writes "Comes with strong and powerful BPM ". webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration, whereas webMethods.io is most compared with .
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.