BusinessGenetics xBML vs Camunda comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BusinessGenetics Logo
117 views|30 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Camunda Logo
10,555 views|6,502 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BusinessGenetics xBML and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design.
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Design Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"One of the things that I have found most valuable is that it is very easy to use. For example, they have built-in existing processes that you can easily modify."

More BusinessGenetics xBML Pros →

"The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs.""Camunda is a scalable product.""Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible.""Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers.""I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features.""The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out.""The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.""We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."

More Camunda Pros →

Cons
"At the moment there are very few people who can lead training for the product. I think that area needs to improve."

More BusinessGenetics xBML Cons →

"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now.""We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved.""When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks.""The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners.""They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome.""It would be helpful to have more readily available use cases on the internet. Camunda's documentation feels less comprehensive.""The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw.""If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."

More Camunda Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."
  • "We are using the open-source version of this solution."
  • "Camunda is much cheaper."
  • "I use the open-source free version."
  • "The open-source version of the product is free to use."
  • "The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
  • "Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
  • "We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
  • More Camunda Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You can… more »
    Top Answer:Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to… more »
    Top Answer:Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very… more »
    Ranking
    29th
    Views
    117
    Comparisons
    30
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    Views
    10,555
    Comparisons
    6,502
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    911
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Apache Airflow logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Bizagi logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Pega BPM logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    IBM BPM logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Appian logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Also Known As
    xBML
    Camunda BPM
    Learn More
    BusinessGenetics
    Video Not Available
    Camunda
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    BusinessGenetics xBML (extended Business Modelling Language) is an intuitive graphical language that unlocks the DNA of a corporation using a system of diagrams based on five Ws (Who; What; Which; Where; When). xBML gives companies an complete and accurate map of their enterprise, that can then be re-used repeatedly to describe, plan and create improvement.

    Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

    Sample Customers
    Qwest, Wachovia, Corporate Express, State of Colorado, Bank of America
    24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Government13%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise32%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Design
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design. Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BusinessGenetics xBML is ranked 29th in Business Process Design while Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 68 reviews. BusinessGenetics xBML is rated 8.0, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BusinessGenetics xBML writes "Has built-in, existing processes that can be easily modified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". BusinessGenetics xBML is most compared with , whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian.

    See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.