Compare BusinessGenetics xBML vs. iServer
BusinessGenetics xBML is ranked 19th in Business Process Design with 1 review while iServer is ranked 16th in Business Process Design with 4 reviews. BusinessGenetics xBML is rated 8.0, while iServer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of BusinessGenetics xBML writes "Has built-in, existing processes that can be easily modified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of iServer writes "Stable with the potential to scale and integrates well with Microsoft". BusinessGenetics xBML is most compared with , whereas iServer is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, ARIS BPM, MEGA HOPEX, Avolution ABACUS and Visio.
Sponsored | ||
Most Helpful Review | ||||
Use BusinessGenetics xBML? Share your opinion. |
| |||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Signavio, camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design. Updated: July 2020. 430,376 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | ||
The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface. It has an open BPM It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products. The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand. The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part. When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version. The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read. The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable. | One of the things that I have found most valuable is that it is very easy to use. For example, they have built-in existing processes that you can easily modify. | The solution has wide use within Microsoft products. The integration with Microsoft products, and, in particular, Microsoft Office, is great. This is a flexible tool compared to some other solutions. I have to think less with this solution. It's simple. Tech support is very responsive. They solved issues within a prompt response time. iServer is a solution that helps catalog enterprise architect solutions and catalog information. |
Cons | ||
The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages. Lacking in forms visualization. If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map. Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance. I would also like a very easy to use form builder. I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs. I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution. The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself. | At the moment there are very few people who can lead training for the product. I think that area needs to improve. | The migration tool needs to be included in the main package, and not as a separate license. The performance is slow, which is something that should be improved. The one issue is that if you want to import predefined work, you need to put the licensing model in. So if you wanted to import work that was done before, you then need to buy a separate product for that. It definitely needs help to improve the visual aspect of the solution. There are other solutions out there that have a better user interface. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | ||
I use the open-source free version. Camunda is much cheaper. We are using the open-source version of this solution. It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range. | Information Not Available | Information Not Available |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs. 430,376 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||
Popular Comparisons | ||
 Compared 18% of the time.  Compared 15% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time. |  Compared 32% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time. | |
Also Known As | ||
| xBML | ||
Learn | ||
| camunda | BusinessGenetics Video Not Available | Orbus Software |
Overview  | ||
Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules. Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:
| BusinessGenetics xBML (extended Business Modelling Language) is an intuitive graphical language that unlocks the DNA of a corporation using a system of diagrams based on five Ws (Who; What; Which; Where; When). xBML gives companies an complete and accurate map of their enterprise, that can then be re-used repeatedly to describe, plan and create improvement. | iServer is a unified software platform and enterprise modeling environment that extends and enhances the familiar, market leading Microsoft Visio and Office products. Core capabilities provided by iServer include an enhanced Microsoft Visio diagramming interface, a powerful central repository for all enterprise architecture or business process models and documentation, and a range of tools for visualization, analysis and decision making. |
Offer | ||
Learn more about Camunda BPM | Learn more about BusinessGenetics xBML | Learn more about iServer |
Sample Customers | ||
| AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, Accruent | Qwest, Wachovia, Corporate Express, State of Colorado, Bank of America | Barclays, Cathay Pacific, Deloitte, British Gas, MasterCard |
Top Industries | ||
Financial Services Firm25% Non Profit25% Comms Service Provider13% Construction Company13% Computer Software Company39% Comms Service Provider14% Media Company6% Government6% | No Data Available | Computer Software Company27% Government14% Insurance Company9% Financial Services Firm8% |
Company Size | ||
Small Business55% Midsize Enterprise15% Large Enterprise30% Small Business8% Midsize Enterprise19% Large Enterprise72% | No Data Available | Small Business22% Midsize Enterprise22% Large Enterprise56% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Signavio, camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design. Updated: July 2020.
430,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.