We performed a comparison between BusinessGenetics xBML and OpenText ProVision based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design."One of the things that I have found most valuable is that it is very easy to use. For example, they have built-in existing processes that you can easily modify."
"The stability of the product is very good."
"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."
"All the features come as part of a standard license."
"At the moment there are very few people who can lead training for the product. I think that area needs to improve."
"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."
"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."
"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."
Earn 20 points
BusinessGenetics xBML is ranked 29th in Business Process Design while OpenText ProVision is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. BusinessGenetics xBML is rated 8.0, while OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of BusinessGenetics xBML writes "Has built-in, existing processes that can be easily modified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". BusinessGenetics xBML is most compared with , whereas OpenText ProVision is most compared with Visio, ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
