We performed a comparison between BusinessGenetics xBML and Visual Paradigm based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design."One of the things that I have found most valuable is that it is very easy to use. For example, they have built-in existing processes that you can easily modify."
"The most valuable feature of the Visual Paradigm that I use is process modeling. Additionally, the solution has a complete set of features."
"I find it very user-friendly for my purposes, which is creating business process models that I can publish as HTML pages. It has worked flawlessly for my project, and my clients are able to utilize it as an internal web portal for their process documentation and other needs."
"The solution is very user-friendly. It's easy to just open it and start working."
"I like the structure. I can see the diagrams and everything I created."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup was straightforward."
"Visual Paradigm is super user-friendly, especially for new team members. I always have them start with it because the interface is so simple to pick up. They usually spend about six months to a year using only Visual Paradigm before moving on to other tools. We also use the cloud repository for collaborative work, but I've had some trouble with code reviewing and limitations. Sometimes, customers even request the source file or exported XML because it's easier for them to access and review."
"The pricing model is attractive."
"The Visual Paradigm business process forms for designing we good. There was not a lot of configuration for the process diagram."
"At the moment there are very few people who can lead training for the product. I think that area needs to improve."
"The product's versioning capability needs improvement."
"From time to time, we experience some troubles when we work as teams."
"Visual Paradigm is much better now. But each project has its own challenges, which is why I'm exploring different tools for my new projects. For instance, designing reports can be tough, especially with the costly intervention of professional services from vendors."
"The solution's technical support can be improved and accessible for our company location since Visual Paradigm follows a remote support model with some challenges."
"The user interface is not easy to navigate, so it should be made easier."
"Visual Paradigm can improve by having better process mining tools and model integration."
"More flexibility when choosing the type of diagram would be nice."
"The solution can be heavy on resource usage."
Earn 20 points
BusinessGenetics xBML is ranked 29th in Business Process Design while Visual Paradigm is ranked 7th in Business Process Design with 25 reviews. BusinessGenetics xBML is rated 8.0, while Visual Paradigm is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of BusinessGenetics xBML writes "Has built-in, existing processes that can be easily modified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Paradigm writes "Very flexible and easy to use with a good pricing model". BusinessGenetics xBML is most compared with , whereas Visual Paradigm is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio, Lucidchart, Bizagi and No Magic MagicDraw.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
