Compare Buurst SoftNAS vs. Qumulo

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buurst SoftNAS Logo
1,104 views|973 comparisons
Qumulo Logo
5,770 views|4,872 comparisons
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, Dell EMC and others in NAS. Updated: November 2020.
448,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.
448,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
13th
out of 26 in NAS
Views
1,104
Comparisons
973
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
11th
out of 26 in NAS
Views
5,770
Comparisons
4,872
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
412
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
SoftNAS Cloud Enterprise
Learn
Buurst
Qumulo
Overview

SoftNAS Cloud NAS is a software-defined, full-featured enterprise cloud NAS filer for primary data storage that enables existing applications securely migrate to the cloud without re-engineering. With enterprise-class NAS features like: high-availability, deduplication, compression, thin-provisioning, snapshots, replication, cloning, encryption (at rest and in transit), LDAP and Active Directory integration, and support for NFS, CIFS, iSCSI or AFP storage protocols, SoftNAS Cloud NAS protects mission-critical and primary, active/hot data.

Real-time analytics are built directly into the Qumulo Scalable File System (QSFS) enabling instant answers about your data footprint, and how it’s being used, at scale.

Built on Linux, Qumulo Core runs on commodity hardware, on dedicated appliances, or in virtual machines providing the ultimate flexibility and cost advantages.

Qumulo Core is optimized for the widest range of workloads and file sizes including transactional and sequential access patterns and small and large files.

Offer
Learn more about Buurst SoftNAS
Learn more about Qumulo
Sample Customers
Netflix, Boeing, Nike, Coca Cola, Hearst, Ndemand, Carbon Media Group, Atypon, The Street, MagHub, CenturyLink, InfoSysUniversity of Washington, Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, Zoic Studios, Sinclair Oil, Blind Visual Propaganda, Sportvision, Telus Studios, Ant Farm, Densho, MSG Netowrks, Eight Solutions
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider16%
K 12 Educational Company Or School11%
Insurance Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider9%
Retailer6%
Manufacturing Company5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, Dell EMC and others in NAS. Updated: November 2020.
448,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Buurst SoftNAS is ranked 13th in NAS while Qumulo is ranked 11th in NAS with 1 review. Buurst SoftNAS is rated 0.0, while Qumulo is rated 0.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qumulo writes "Easy to set up, good technical support, and it provides valuable usage analytics ". Buurst SoftNAS is most compared with NetApp FAS Series, FreeNAS, Dell EMC PowerScale (Isilon), NetApp Private Storage and Huawei OceanStor 9000, whereas Qumulo is most compared with Dell EMC PowerScale (Isilon), NetApp FAS Series, Scality RING8, Red Hat Ceph Storage and Pure Storage FlashBlade.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.