Compare C2C ArchiveOne vs. Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver
Ranking  | |
Views 54 Comparisons 25 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 18 Comparisons 5 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
Also Known As | |
| ArchiveOne | Cloud Archiver |
Learn | |
| C2C Video Not Available | Waterford Technologies |
Overview | |
| Manage emails and archive important correspondence for long term storage and and control of information | Cloud Archiver provides a comprehensive solution that maximizes storage intelligence and data placement by using policies to control the movement of critical data from on premise storage to the most appropriate cloud storage transparently for the end users. End users access their data in the same manner they always have regardless of if the file has been archived or not making Cloud Archiver a complete solution for your data management needs. |
Offer | |
Learn more about C2C ArchiveOne | Learn more about Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver |
Sample Customers | |
| Alta Loma School District, Gray Reed and McGraw P.C., Chemung County, City of Manchester, Gallon Takacs Boissoneault & Schaffer, City of Staunton, City of Manassas | Savenet Solutions |
C2C ArchiveOne is ranked 15th in File Archiving while Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver is ranked 21st in File Archiving. C2C ArchiveOne is rated 0.0, while Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver is rated 0.0. On the other hand, C2C ArchiveOne is most compared with , whereas Waterford Technologies Cloud Archiver is most compared with .
See our list of best File Archiving vendors.
We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.