CA 1 Tape Management vs Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA 1 Tape Management and Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in Storage Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Storage Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Beyza Aksöz
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"With this product, it all becomes automatic: locating the data, backing up the data, restoring the data. We can automate all that with it.""package that manages all of your tapes. Create/write/catalog, retention, delete. There are queries and reports, which are needed to know when/where/length keeping, etc., in order to track them or find out current status.""The solution is stable.""The tapes are mounted automatically. You can read a tape automatically without waiting for someone to insert it.""It has become easy to backup and archive all our system data and financial data. It helps us mainly in managing the backup of our databases, and it is easy to retrieve that data and find it in a secure place."

More CA 1 Tape Management Pros →

"The stability of the Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager is good."

More Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"The product itself is fairly complex so the install is as well.""The solution's cost needs improvement.""When we want to interface the CA 1 product with other vendors, IBM or others, it is difficult to interface it with them, because you need some exits, you need to compile some assemblers."

More CA 1 Tape Management Cons →

"Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager could improve by having more parameters for storage. When you take the solution out of the box there need to be some more features built-in."

More Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Storage Management solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The solution is stable.
Top Answer:The solution's pricing could be better.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
7th
out of 27 in Storage Management
Views
412
Comparisons
252
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
167
Rating
10.0
Unranked
In Storage Management
Comparisons
Also Known As
BrightStor Tape Management
HPE Storage Essentials, HPE Storage Operations Manager
Learn More
Overview

CA 1 Tape Management (CA 1) is designed to simplify and unify the management and protection of z/OS tape data sets and volumes. It automates day-to-day z/OS tape management tasks to save your organization time and money. It enables a higher level of integrity for tape data while providing comprehensive protection against the inadvertent destruction of tape files. CA 1 helps you maintain data integrity, providing tools to continually check your data and prevent overwriting. To give you greater control, a Web-based Graphical Management Interface streams detailed tape volume information and provides a common platform for more efficient management practices.

With Micro Focus Storage Essentials, you can manage complexity and growth, improve storage utilization and reduce cost, and align storage service to business needs.

Sample Customers
TravelPort, AlphaServe, Rogers Communication
Etty Hillesum Lyceum, University of Cincinnati, Lancaster Central School District
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm26%
Insurance Company23%
Computer Software Company10%
Government9%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise4%
Large Enterprise77%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Storage Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in Storage Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA 1 Tape Management is ranked 7th in Storage Management with 6 reviews while Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Storage Management. CA 1 Tape Management is rated 9.6, while Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CA 1 Tape Management writes "An easy-to-use solution with good technical support services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] writes "Helpful support, useful AI, and reliable". CA 1 Tape Management is most compared with CA TLMS Tape Management (CA TLMS), CA Allocate DASD Space and Placement, CA Vtape Virtual Tape System (CA Vtape) and IBM Spectrum Control, whereas Micro Focus Storage Operations Manager [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Storage Management vendors.

We monitor all Storage Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.