CA Risk Authentication [EOL] vs Symantec Advanced Authentication comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Risk Authentication [EOL] and Symantec Advanced Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "There are eventually going to be implementation costs. Sometimes you're required to have custom code developments there, so that has to be part of the implementation price."
  • "The price is reasonable."
  • More Symantec Advanced Authentication Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:One of the most valuable aspects is its remarkable stability.
    Top Answer:There has been a need for aggressive development to modernize the product and align it with contemporary security requirements. While the rebranding has been a step forward, further enhancements are… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Authentication Systems
    19th
    Views
    326
    Comparisons
    197
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    770
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA RiskMinder
    CA Advanced Authentication, CA Strong Authentication, CA Risk Authentication, Arcot WebFort, Arcot RiskFort
    Learn More
    Overview

    CA Risk Authentication is a powerful risk-based, adaptive authentication solution that works in real time to evaluate context, calculate a risk score, recommend actions and provide alerts/case management. It has a strong set of prebuilt rules to detect risk and an easy-to-use risk management console to adjust parameters or create new rules. The risk engine examines many factors including device identification, geolocation, IP address and user activity to evaluate risk. The calculated risk score is then fed into your policies to decide whether to authorize the current activity, request step-up authentication and/or send an alert or block the activity. This provides your organization with a transparent layer of protection against identity theft, data breaches and fraud. CA Risk Authentication can be used to reduce fraud and protect users from Internet attacks whether they are shopping online or accessing confidential or private information via a Web portal or application. It also provides organizations the ability to enforce different levels of authentication depending on the user activity, transaction value and the calculated risk score.

    CA Advanced Authentication provides a secure, user-convenient and cost-effective way to protect online and mobile applications. The solution consists of two components:  CA Risk Authentication allows the enterprise to silently and transparently collect data and assess risk based on device identification, location and user behavior, among other factors, and CA Strong Authentication provides a wide variety of software-based, two-factor authentication credentials and technology to make passwords more secure.  Together they enable an intelligent, layered security approach to protect user identities and organizational data.

    Take the assessment


    Sample Customers
    Global bank based in the United States
    Global bank, Large Filipino Bank and SK Infosec
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Real Estate/Law Firm13%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Large Enterprise78%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Authentication Systems
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Risk Authentication [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems while Symantec Advanced Authentication is ranked 19th in Authentication Systems with 9 reviews. CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Symantec Advanced Authentication is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CA Risk Authentication [EOL] writes "If we spot anomalies we can step up authentication. The policy entrance should learn from that state rather than reverting back to what it believes is the static good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Advanced Authentication writes "Ensures robust security features and ease of deployment, although it may lack some of the more modern authentication options ". CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Symantec Advanced Authentication is most compared with OneSpan DIGIPASS, Thales Authenticators and Symantec VIP Access Manager.

    See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

    We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.