We performed a comparison between CA Risk Authentication [EOL] and Symantec Advanced Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.More Symantec Advanced Authentication Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CA Risk Authentication [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems while Symantec Advanced Authentication is ranked 19th in Authentication Systems with 9 reviews. CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Symantec Advanced Authentication is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CA Risk Authentication [EOL] writes "If we spot anomalies we can step up authentication. The policy entrance should learn from that state rather than reverting back to what it believes is the static good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Advanced Authentication writes "Ensures robust security features and ease of deployment, although it may lack some of the more modern authentication options ". CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Symantec Advanced Authentication is most compared with OneSpan DIGIPASS, Thales Authenticators and Symantec VIP Access Manager.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.