One Identity Defender vs Symantec Advanced Authentication comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between One Identity Defender and Symantec Advanced Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"One Identity Defender has good network protection.""We find that the product scales very well.""It's very fast, and it's easy to use because it's integrated with Active Directory."

More One Identity Defender Pros →

"One of the most valuable aspects is its remarkable stability.""One of the most valuable features of this solution is that it's a strong authentication solution that's able to integrate with applications.""Rules on Risk Authentication are very good.""It tells us exactly what we want in terms of authentication to various applications and provides protection for users who access them."

More Symantec Advanced Authentication Pros →

Cons
"The login capabilities could be better.""Maybe it could provide support for more web applications. It seems more focused on IIS web applications.""We have some clients that are wanting to protect their Apache web servers with One Identity Defender but all the research I have done says cannot be done. It can only be oriented to an IIS server. One Identity Defender should have more integration with more types of web servers."

More One Identity Defender Cons →

"We have seen quite a few issues with bugginess. It is indeed pretty buggy and we have had to install some fixes.""Advanced Authentication talks about the Device ID. But how the device ID is captured, I want to know more about that.""This solution could be improved with risk-based authentication. I think that this product has everything that most customers are looking for, but modern technology has people looking for security tools with risk-based authentication, which they have a separate tool for. If they could integrate this, it would improve Symantec Advanced Authentication. They have to look at what's newly trending and how things are moving forward, and then adapt and adopt those features. Symantec's technical support should also be improved, in terms of response time.""Urgent improvement is necessary to ensure that support responses are faster and more effective, aligning with the demands of MFA implementation."

More Symantec Advanced Authentication Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "There are eventually going to be implementation costs. Sometimes you're required to have custom code developments there, so that has to be part of the implementation price."
  • "The price is reasonable."
  • More Symantec Advanced Authentication Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's very fast, and it's easy to use because it's integrated with Active Directory.
    Top Answer:Maybe it could provide support for more web applications. It would be useful to focus on other web applications. For example, if an application needs to be installed on an iOS server and it's not, it… more »
    Top Answer:Our primary use cases include functions such as role-based access control, user registration, and integration with other systems. We use it to improve the security of our web applications… more »
    Top Answer:One of the most valuable aspects is its remarkable stability.
    Top Answer:There has been a need for aggressive development to modernize the product and align it with contemporary security requirements. While the rebranding has been a step forward, further enhancements are… more »
    Ranking
    16th
    Views
    340
    Comparisons
    243
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    630
    Rating
    10.0
    19th
    Views
    326
    Comparisons
    197
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    770
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Advanced Authentication, CA Strong Authentication, CA Risk Authentication, Arcot WebFort, Arcot RiskFort
    Learn More
    Overview

    Defender enhances security by requiring two-factor authentication to gain access to your network resources. Defender uses your current identity store within Microsoft Active Directory (AD) to enable two-factor authentication.

    CA Advanced Authentication provides a secure, user-convenient and cost-effective way to protect online and mobile applications. The solution consists of two components:  CA Risk Authentication allows the enterprise to silently and transparently collect data and assess risk based on device identification, location and user behavior, among other factors, and CA Strong Authentication provides a wide variety of software-based, two-factor authentication credentials and technology to make passwords more secure.  Together they enable an intelligent, layered security approach to protect user identities and organizational data.

    Take the assessment


    Sample Customers
    Bakersfield Police Department, Village of Westmont, Illinois
    Global bank, Large Filipino Bank and SK Infosec
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Real Estate/Law Firm13%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Large Enterprise78%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Authentication Systems
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    One Identity Defender is ranked 16th in Authentication Systems with 3 reviews while Symantec Advanced Authentication is ranked 19th in Authentication Systems with 9 reviews. One Identity Defender is rated 8.6, while Symantec Advanced Authentication is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of One Identity Defender writes "Good compatibility, responsive support, and a nice interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Advanced Authentication writes "Ensures robust security features and ease of deployment, although it may lack some of the more modern authentication options ". One Identity Defender is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo, whereas Symantec Advanced Authentication is most compared with OneSpan DIGIPASS, Thales Authenticators and Symantec VIP Access Manager.

    See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

    We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.