Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Requirements Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Helps the communication between the testing organization and the requirements group. It helps us to simplify the work. Instead of dealing with individual test cases, you're working with a model.""In terms of meeting business challenges, it helped to shorten the dev/testing cycle by identifying requirements gaps early in the process, by having models shared within the development team. It helped increase test coverage and reduce the number of issues experienced by clients/customers.""The support that we get from Broadcom is great.""​The scale possibilities are endless, especially when combined with all the other products that CA has to offer.""Defects can be traced in the solution.""It gives us an idea of creating the visual diagrams, which are quite easy to use. It is helpful in creating our business processes.""Integration with automation is one of the reasons we started to consider moving to this tool from our original tool for implementing test modeling. ARD appears to have better integration with Selenium. It also has the ability to record scripts/flows using Selenium Builder and import them into ARD, which will then create and optimize a model based on that.""Measuring test coverage helps in one of the most challenging tasks. It has logic that can help to select the right set of scenarios and know what coverage it will provide."

More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Pros →

"The most valuable features are the versioning of requirements and the possibility to reuse them.""As far as maintaining our requirements so that we can have copies of them, it's good. I can print it out if necessary.""There are many good features with DOORS. The solution has a concept of streams and baselines, as well as a concept of components. A component is a subproject inside a project.""It's web-based, so you don't have anything to install.""The most valuable features are the baselines and links.""The "Link by Attribute" feature is useful for making links without needing to use the web interface manually.""My company contacts the solution's technical support, and they are good and responsive.""IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is easier to expand to build a backend with several servers, so you can also use it to scale up to several hundreds of users without major problems."

More IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation Pros →

Cons
"They do not have an engine to house test scripts to really pull together the testing pieces of it.""It would help if it would save different subsets of test cases, use cases, etc., of a given diagram, for different purposes and provide an easy way to name those subsets.""The solution could be more user-friendly. For example, attachments could be icon-based to make it easier for the user to notice them.""Data flexibility is something which I would like to see, along with more integration with App Test.""Needs improvement in aligning models so they look clear and readable without having to move boxes around.""At present, there is no option for test data parameters from ARD for virtual databases. We have to create them in TDM and push them as well. Virtual database connectivity needs to be improved. They need to come up with some areas where they can create synthetic data parameters easily from the test cases that have been designed.""Integration with Agile management tools can be improved, i.e., mainly test case maintenance and linking test cases to the automation script.""I think it's already coming, but it needs more automation aspects. There is a tab for Automation, but I think it's not robust. I think that it's going to be a crucial element of the tool."

More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Cons →

"Be very careful how you load your DNG server. There are limits to the number of artifacts a server can handle.""There is room for improvement in the APIs that they have exposed for integration.""It offers a bad user experience and the usability is poor.""I have come to the conclusion that if you are considering migrating from DOORS to DNG, don't! Instead of spending 100's to 1000's of hours doing migrations, invest those hours in a DXL programmer to make DOORS do what it isn't doing for you now.""When you are in Jira or Confluence, you have some freedom in how you type in text. That's also a weakness of Confluence, however, as it opens the doors to sloppy work. In DOS Next Generation, the text is very rigorous, but it might be difficult for people who don't have the discipline. Having a way to quickly enter requirements could help. It might already be in there, but I don't know. I don't have enough experience with the tool yet.""It does have a tendency to condense the requirements. It kind of puts them in a tree format. Sometimes those trees are a little difficult.""The only additional feature would be if it had dynamic linking to other MBSE tool sets or industry-leading tools.""Both the data storage and reporting for this solution need improvement."

More IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "​The cost of the tool was well worth the benefit that we saw on the back-end."
  • "We were able to scale down some resources to basically self-fund our ability to purchase the tool."
  • "This tool reduces the cost associated with test cases, automation script generation, and maintenance costs."
  • "It is less costly when compared to other tools on the market."
  • "Recommendation is to go with concurrent licenses as oppose to seat license; this gives more flexibility."
  • "At present, Broadcom works through partners rather than dealing directly with the consumer. When there are discounts given, it's up to the partner as to whether they want to give that discount to the customer. Sometimes, the partners decide to take the discount themselves. Pricewise, I would give ARD's price a rating of three out of five."
  • "The pricing model is based on how many people are using it. We have an annual license. There are not any additional costs."
  • More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "You are going to need a beefy server and a fat network pipe to it in order to make DNG and its companion tools work well for users."
  • "The cost of maintenance is €20,000 to €30,000 ($22,000 to $33,000 USD) and there are no additional fees."
  • "Users can buy a three-year license for about 12,000 Euros."
  • "The price of this solution is very high, and it increases year after year."
  • "If the product price were not reasonable enough, our company would not use IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation."
  • More IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer are ease of use, saving time for the team who builds test cases, and visibility of test cases.
    Top Answer:The pricing model is based on how many people are using it. We have an annual license. There are not any additional costs.
    Top Answer:Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer could improve the UI. Other solutions have a much better UI. The new UI should have a new modern framework.
    Top Answer:My company contacts the solution's technical support, and they are good and responsive.
    Top Answer:I cannot discuss the product's price since it is meant to be confidential and kept between our company and IBM. If the product price were not reasonable enough, our company would not use IBM Rational… more »
    Top Answer:IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is not a very user-friendly product. From an improvement perspective, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation needs to be made a very user-friendly product.
    Ranking
    Views
    248
    Comparisons
    114
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    363
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    4,811
    Comparisons
    1,579
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    671
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Grid Tools Agile Designer, CA ARD, CA Agile Requirements Designer
    RDNG, Rational Requirements Composer and IBM RRC
    Learn More
    Overview
    CA Agile Requirements Designer is an end-to-end requirements gathering, test automation and test case design tool which drastically reduces manual testing effort and enables organizations to deliver quality software to market earlier and at less cost. The optimal set of manual or automated tests can be derived automatically from requirements modeled as unambiguous flowcharts and are linked to the right data and expected results. These tests are updated automatically when the requirements change, allowing organizations to deliver quality software which reflects changing user needs.

    IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation (DNG) is a web-based requirements management tool developed by IBM. It is designed to help organizations capture, manage, and trace requirements throughout the entire product development lifecycle. DNG is part of the IBM Rational solution suite and offers a range of features to support requirements management and collaboration among project teams.

    IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation Features:

    • Requirements Capture and Management: DNG allows users to capture and organize requirements in a structured manner, providing a central repository for requirement artifacts.
    • Traceability and Impact Analysis: The tool enables traceability by establishing relationships between requirements, test cases, design artifacts, and other project artifacts. This allows users to analyze the impact of changes and ensure requirements coverage.
    • Collaboration and Review: DNG facilitates collaboration among stakeholders by providing features for discussion, commenting, and reviewing requirements. It allows teams to collaborate in real-time and provides a historical record of discussions.
    • Change Management and Version Control: DNG supports change management by tracking requirement changes, maintaining version history, and providing capabilities for managing baselines and variants.
    • Reporting and Analytics: The tool offers reporting and analytics capabilities to generate custom reports, track project progress, monitor requirements coverage, and gain insights into project metrics.
    • Integration and Open APIs: DNG supports integration with other tools and systems commonly used in the software development lifecycle. It provides open APIs that allow organizations to integrate DNG with their existing toolchain and processes.

    IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation Benefits:

    • Centralized Requirements Management: DNG provides a central repository for managing requirements, ensuring a single source of truth and promoting consistency and clarity across the organization.
    • Improved Collaboration and Communication: The tool facilitates collaboration and communication among stakeholders, allowing teams to work together effectively, address conflicts, and align on requirements.
    • Enhanced Traceability and Compliance: DNG enables traceability between requirements and other project artifacts, supporting compliance with industry standards, regulations, and quality frameworks.
    • Efficient Change Management: With DNG, teams can effectively manage changes to requirements, track version history, and analyze the impact of changes on the project.
    • Increased Productivity and Efficiency: The tool automates manual tasks, provides workflow support, and offers streamlined collaboration features, improving productivity and efficiency in requirements management.
    • Reporting and Decision-Making: DNG's reporting and analytics capabilities provide stakeholders with valuable insights into project status, progress, and metrics, enabling informed decision-making.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Hubert Zenner, Technical Sales Specialist at a computer software company, says that "IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is easier to expand to build a backend with several servers, so you can also use it to scale up to several hundreds of users without major problems."

    Kapil Raikar, Senior Manager – Development, PD and Data Virtulization at a computer software company, states that "There are many good features with DOORS. The solution has a concept of streams and baselines, as well as a concept of components. A component is a subproject inside a project."

    Roger Trackwell, System Engineering Manager at a wholesaler,

    Sample Customers
    Williams, Rabobank
    Major health insurer
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Energy/Utilities Company14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Energy/Utilities Company17%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Computer Software Company10%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Manufacturing Company30%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Wholesaler/Distributor10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company21%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm9%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business9%
    Large Enterprise91%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is ranked 8th in Application Requirements Management with 20 reviews while IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is ranked 4th in Application Requirements Management with 11 reviews. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is rated 7.8, while IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer writes "Easy to use, beneficial test case visibility, and effective support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation writes "An industry-leading tool to demonstrate traceability between requirements, with valuable features for tailoring modules and managing several thousand requirements". Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Jira, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira and Sealights, whereas IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jama Connect, Jira, Polarion Requirements and Helix ALM. See our Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation report.

    See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

    We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.