Compare CA Agile Requirements Designer vs. Tricentis Tosca

CA Agile Requirements Designer is ranked 4th in Test Management Tools with 10 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 6 reviews. CA Agile Requirements Designer is rated 8.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CA Agile Requirements Designer writes "‚ÄčThe scale possibilities are endless, especially when combined with all the other products that CA has to offer". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "TOSCA Testsuite Review". CA Agile Requirements Designer is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, JIRA and Conformiq, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with UFT (QTP), Selenium HQ and SmartBear TestComplete. See our CA Agile Requirements Designer vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Agile Requirements Designer vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
CA ARD has some beautiful features which I haven't found anywhere else. For example, when designing or creating our test cases and doing scenarios, we are able to restrict our flows. If we take a data link between two processes, we can actually restrict it, so that, in production, if our functionality breaks down, we can restrict that and all the flows related to it will be removed from the test data set.In terms of meeting business challenges, it helped to shorten the dev/testing cycle by identifying requirements gaps early in the process, by having models shared within the development team. It helped increase test coverage and reduce the number of issues experienced by clients/customers.The ability to create models/diagrams at multiple levels (nest/embed them) helps in taking models from high-level business requirements and building them into detailed requirements models and test models. Plus, it helps reuse lower level models. It also allows maintaining models at appropriate levels, even for very complex systems/solutions.Integration with TDM, test data management tool, provides the ability to generate data or use identified (preset or parametrized) test data. It allows significant expansion of test coverage and flexibility, without creating new tests and needing to maintain them.Integration with automation is one of the reasons we started to consider moving to this tool from our original tool for implementing test modeling. ARD appears to have better integration with Selenium. It also has the ability to record scripts/flows using Selenium Builder and import them into ARD, which will then create and optimize a model based on that.Measuring test coverage helps in one of the most challenging tasks. It has logic that can help to select the right set of scenarios and know what coverage it will provide.Defects can be traced in the solution.The optimization technique helps in giving us the minimum number of test cases with maximum coverage.

Read more »

The solution is script-less, so you don't need IT knowledge to use the solution in an operational way. This is the most valuable feature. It's also only one of two or three tools that can do good automation on SAP, and in my opinion, it's the best of those.It has helped teams within our organization become more aware of the testing requirements in terms of risk and priority.Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people.We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis.We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation.

Read more »

Cons
CA ARD doesn't provide integration with Tosca. The possibility of creating a test case and exporting it into Tosca is not available. Integration with end-to-end automation tools, like Worksoft or Tosca, is not provided by CA ARD as of now.Needs improvement in aligning models so they look clear and readable without having to move boxes around.It would help if it would save different subsets of test cases, use cases, etc., of a given diagram, for different purposes and provide an easy way to name those subsets.The solution could be more user-friendly. For example, attachments could be icon-based to make it easier for the user to notice them.Data flexibility is something which I would like to see, along with more integration with App Test.A template in App Test should be created in advance. This has proven to be time consuming. The process is not fully automated, because there is a lot of manual intervention is required.Integration with Agile management tools can be improved, i.e., mainly test case maintenance and linking test cases to the automation script.I think it's already coming, but it needs more automation aspects. There is a tab for Automation, but I think it's not robust. I think that it's going to be a crucial element of the tool.

Read more »

The solution should work with the Linux platform. Right now, it only runs on Windows.Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation.Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications. Therefore, it wasn't an easy setup for us.It needs better integration with JIRA.I would like a better user interface.Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Recommendation is to go with concurrent licenses as oppose to seat license; this gives more flexibility.It is less costly when compared to other tools on the market.This tool reduces the cost associated with test cases, automation script generation, and maintenance costs.‚ÄčThe cost of the tool was well worth the benefit that we saw on the back-end.We were able to scale down some resources to basically self-fund our ability to purchase the tool.

Read more »

Tricentis Tosca may be relatively on the higher side in terms of pricing, but their sales rep can give pretty decent deals when asked.We hired a consultant to figure out all the tools in our company and how they fit in our company before we purchased the solution.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
378,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
Views
5,940
Comparisons
1,755
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
655
Avg. Rating
7.9
3rd
Views
35,851
Comparisons
14,625
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
372
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Grid Tools Agile Designer, CA ARD
Learn
CA (A Broadcom Company)
Tricentis
Overview
CA Agile Requirements Designer is an end-to-end requirements gathering, test automation and test case design tool which drastically reduces manual testing effort and enables organizations to deliver quality software to market earlier and at less cost. The optimal set of manual or automated tests can be derived automatically from requirements modeled as unambiguous flowcharts and are linked to the right data and expected results. These tests are updated automatically when the requirements change, allowing organizations to deliver quality software which reflects changing user needs.

Tricentis Tosca specializes in enabling large enterprises to improve the quality of their applications by equipping them to optimize, manage, and automate their software testing.

Tosca's model-based approach to software test automation enables enterprises to achieve high automation rates while maximizing business risk coverage.

Tricentis Tosca also provides market-leading test case design and planning capabilities, test data provisioning, service virtualization, mobile testing, and more.

Tosca is fully compatible with other testing solutions and Application Lifecycle Management products. Tricentis also offers uniquely designed testing solutions for SAP, ServiceNow, Trax, Avaloq, and Oracle.

Offer
Learn more about CA Agile Requirements Designer
Learn more about Tricentis Tosca
Sample Customers
Williams, Rabobank HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm58%
Energy/Utilities Company17%
Comms Service Provider17%
Manufacturing Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm32%
Software R&D Company30%
Insurance Company10%
Engineering Company8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company15%
Healthcare Company10%
Retailer10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company32%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company10%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business5%
Large Enterprise95%
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise62%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise85%
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Agile Requirements Designer vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email