CA Allocate DASD Space and Placement vs Hitachi Storage Command Portal [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Allocate DASD Space and Placement and Hitachi Storage Command Portal [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in Storage Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Storage Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
14th
out of 27 in Storage Management
Views
199
Comparisons
109
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Storage Management
Buyer's Guide
Storage Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in Storage Management. Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
BrightStor DASD Space and Placement
Storage Command Portal
Learn More
Overview

CA Allocate DASD Space and Placement (CA Allocate) enables more efficient use of DASD by enforcing allocation policies and procedures and redirecting inaccurate allocations for proper grouping, optimum space or best-fit usage.
In addition, X-37 resolution can prevent application failures to help save your enterprise time, resources and money. CA Allocate can help your enterprise maximize tape and DASD usage and optimize tape management resources with dynamic storage management for new allocations, and flexible, user-defined rules for allocation management.

The Hitachi Storage Command Portal (HSCP) centralizes storage management reporting across the Hitachi Storage Command management suite by providing custom business views of applications and reports on Hitachi storage usage by those applications. HSCP provides a way to easily align Hitachi storage assets with the applications and business functions that use them.

Sample Customers
Tieto
UHC (University HealthSystem Consortium)
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Government44%
Financial Services Firm17%
Healthcare Company8%
Manufacturing Company7%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Storage Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in Storage Management. Updated: March 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA Allocate DASD Space and Placement is ranked 14th in Storage Management while Hitachi Storage Command Portal [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Storage Management. CA Allocate DASD Space and Placement is rated 6.0, while Hitachi Storage Command Portal [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CA Allocate DASD Space and Placement writes "It's a space recovery product that helps us fix problems before they happen so we work on them after running a job, but I don't want to have to touch a file to make changes or updates". On the other hand, CA Allocate DASD Space and Placement is most compared with CA 1 Tape Management, whereas Hitachi Storage Command Portal [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Storage Management vendors.

We monitor all Storage Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.