We performed a comparison between CA Allocate DASD Space and Placement and Tintri SyncVM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in Storage Management.
CA Allocate DASD Space and Placement is ranked 14th in Storage Management while Tintri SyncVM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Storage Management. CA Allocate DASD Space and Placement is rated 6.0, while Tintri SyncVM [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CA Allocate DASD Space and Placement writes "It's a space recovery product that helps us fix problems before they happen so we work on them after running a job, but I don't want to have to touch a file to make changes or updates". On the other hand, CA Allocate DASD Space and Placement is most compared with CA 1 Tape Management, whereas Tintri SyncVM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Storage Management vendors.
We monitor all Storage Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
