We performed a comparison between Broadcom DX Application Performance Management and InfoVista 5View NetFlow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."It helps us prioritize application performance issues. It has assisted triage where we can drill down and see where exactly the problem lies."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"JVM memory monitoring and connection pool monitoring are valuable features."
"If we see something that we need to change or monitor, we can get it scripted pretty quickly."
"Stability is one of the strongest attributes of CA APM. It is very stable on all platforms."
"I have found Broadcom DX Application Performance Management to be scalable."
"Service maturity when you can retrieve the normal metrics for every major aspect of each module and delivering this info to the correct eyes."
"Crash analytics goes down to the level of code you need to check."
"InfoVista 5View NetFlow allows us to control the application layer and manage API connections, i.e. Facebook logins or whatever other third-party API services we require."
"We enountered stability issues. They were mitigated by performance tuning within infrastructure."
"The reason it's not a ten is because they don't focus enough on improving over time like other competitors do who have a more modern and complete tool."
"Our users lag how to identify the root cause with this solution. If they could come up with a more user-friendly version, that would be a good thing, since other vendors currently have better features and more user-friendly products than CA APM."
"It doesn't have a proper database, and the configuration is very difficult."
"Upgradability to it is a project instead of a patch. If it was actually an automated process to where it just fed updates to our product that would be great. Now, we have to spin up an effort to actually upgrade the solution."
"Technical support is slow to respond and also asks redundant questions."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive and address support tickets more quickly."
"Issue resolution needs to be faster, rather than having users wait for the next release for issues to be fixed."
"A little bit better documentation on the details is needed because this subject is not easy sometimes to understand, which limits the capability of the software."
More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is ranked 25th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 161 reviews while InfoVista 5View NetFlow is ranked 61st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is rated 8.0, while InfoVista 5View NetFlow is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management writes "Provides efficiency in migration and DAW but requires a high level of administrator knowledge for configuration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of InfoVista 5View NetFlow writes "Great for service discovery and load balancing and enables us to monitor the traffic flow". Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, VMware Aria Operations for Applications, BMC TrueSight Operations Management and New Relic, whereas InfoVista 5View NetFlow is most compared with Catchpoint.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.