We performed a comparison between Broadcom DX Application Performance Management and VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Broadcom is praised for its simple implementation and setup process, along with its code-level visibility, transaction monitoring feature, and dependable technical assistance. Meanwhile, VMware Tanzu is highly regarded for its effortless deployment, ability to integrate with various platforms, support for container environments, and impressive scalability.
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management reviews suggest the need for improvements in various areas such as integration, front-end performance, support, CPU and memory issues, end-to-end correlation automation, and compatibility with OpenShift 4. VMware Tanzu improvements include the need for enhancements in the billing model, customizable metrics and dashboards, licensing, documentation, and the initial setup process.
Service and Support: Some users of Broadcom DX expressed dissatisfaction; others praised the helpfulness. Suggestions have been made for improvement in commitment to service-level agreements. Similarly, users of VMware Tanzu Observability have had varied experiences with some users not requiring support, and others facing issues around longer wait times.
Ease of Deployment: Broadcom users had mixed experiences with the initial setup, with some users finding it fast and straightforward, while others mentioned it took about two months. VMware Tanzu had a varied setup process among reviewers. Some found it easy and quick, while others found it complex, especially when setting up clusters.
Pricing: Broadcom DX utilizes a monthly licensing fee for its setup cost, and users propose that the pricing structure should be tied to memory or CPU usage rather than the number of agents. In contrast, VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is deemed costly, with reviewers highlighting supplementary expenses for integrations and add-ons.
Comparison Results: Based on user feedback, VMware Tanzu is the preferred choice over Broadcom DX. Users found the setup of VMware Tanzu Observability to be quick and easy, taking only hours or minutes. Users also praised the deployment and integration of VMware Tanzu Observability, as well as its support for container platforms and scalability.
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is its user interface."
"I found the solution's end-to-end analysis and flexibility most valuable."
"It covers from mainframe, all the way to dotcom, for example. CA currently covers Amazon, Microsoft Azure, Office 365 monitoring."
"It helps us prioritize application performance issues. It has assisted triage where we can drill down and see where exactly the problem lies."
"The most valuable feature of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management for me is transaction monitoring. The technical support provided for the solution is also an advantage."
"It has a random transaction trace which gives our customers the ability to look at how their transaction performs."
"We did the setup for a new datacenter, and that was pretty straightforward."
"If we see something that we need to change or monitor, we can get it scripted pretty quickly."
"VMware comes with a support team, and if you have trouble, you can easily create a ticket, and VMware will help you. Therefore, the best aspect is the support."
"The solution is great for virtualization and preparing the infrastructure in Tanzu to test products. It's very fast and has good visibility."
"People are very pleased with the implementation."
"For us, the ease of deployment in combination with TMZ was the most important part because we don't have to manually deploy a complex monitoring solution. We can more or less do that with the click of a button, and we are not dependent on the developers to provide us with all the necessary features and functions to make that work. We can just deploy it on a workload cluster and monitor at least a good part of the workload. If we want to go into detail, we clearly need to make changes, but for a good part of application monitoring, it gives us good insights."
"Tanzu itself, integrated with multiple solutions, bestows support and security upon a container platform, especially when it comes to managing open-source container platforms such as Kubernetes."
"The features I find most valuable is the querying and alerting capabilities."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation."
"No issues with stability."
"There is no auto flow diagram, and the alert mechanism is not as good when compared to other tools."
"Needs the ability to dynamically create dashboards. Right now, we do custom dashboards. Everything is created manually."
"What comes to mind when you speak of a room for improvement in Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is the infrastructure agent, but my company doesn't use it, so I can't say if it's really a problem or not, but it could be the container support or cloud support that could be improved in the solution. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is for it to have one agent for cloud and one agent for legacy, with all features included."
"Its profiling. The uniqueness instead of me looking at sampling data, I need to know the m-1 event that actually triggered my scenario where that m event caused a catastrophic event, like a ripple effect; I need to know that m-1. What triggered my major event means I need to understand the event that triggered it and before the cause of that event itself."
"The interface is getting a little old."
"The reason it's not a ten is because they don't focus enough on improving over time like other competitors do who have a more modern and complete tool."
"The APM SQL feature doesn't perform like we would like it to. I know that's a new feature with 10.5, so it may be one of those things that gets a little better, but it should run faster."
"We need more capabilities to analyze the information that tools collects; for example, using artificial intelligence, or something like that."
"The initial setup should be easier and more seamless."
"The main problem I have is that the license cost is very high."
"It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for the single click operations as well relational data locality."
"Its billing model is consumption-based. I understand the consumption-based model, but it is not necessarily easy to estimate and guess how many points or how much we are going to consume on a specific application up until we get to that point. So, for us, it would be helpful to have more insights or predictability into what we can expect from a cost perspective if we are starting to use specific features. This can potentially also drive our consumption a bit more."
"I would like to see integration with Kubernetes cluster and APIs so that you can manage the entire stack."
"The documentation and integration with Kubernetes could be improved."
"They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us."
"In the new version, I would love to see more prediction capabilities. It would be great if one could see the alerts get a little more enriched with information and become more human-friendly instead of the technical stuff that they put in there. I think those would be really awesome outcomes to get."
More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
More VMware Aria Operations for Applications Pricing and Cost Advice →
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is ranked 25th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 161 reviews while VMware Aria Operations for Applications is ranked 32nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 9 reviews. Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is rated 8.0, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management writes "Provides efficiency in migration and DAW but requires a high level of administrator knowledge for configuration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Aria Operations for Applications writes "Easy to deploy, worth the money, and helpful for uptime monitoring and performance insights". Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, BMC TrueSight Operations Management, New Relic and OpenText Diagnostics, whereas VMware Aria Operations for Applications is most compared with Dynatrace, Grafana, Datadog and Zabbix. See our Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Container Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
