• Home
  • CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA App Synthetic Monitor and OpenText Business Process Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic
Anonymous User
Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CA App Synthetic ...
Top Answer:The product comes with expensive annual licenses. The product is very good, very reliable but it costs a lot. Barracuda offers the same kind of services at a lower price.
What needs improvement with CA App Synthetic Monitor?
Top Answer:If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending and… more »
What is your primary use case for CA App Synthetic Monitor?
Top Answer:If you are sending mail or browsing anything, you don't want to send your traffic without encryption. We use SSL for traffic encryption and ASM for SSL offloading. It is a proxy server for SSL. The… more »
What do you like most about Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?
Top Answer:Synthetic Monitoring is a very good capability as we can simulate the end-user interaction with the application and proactively we can discover issues before the real end users are impacted.
Read all 2 answers   →
How can Micro Focus APM BPM help to identify the root cause of applicati...
Top Answer:Here are some ways that Micro Focus APM (RUM and BPM) can help you identify the root cause of application issues Real User Monitoring (RUM) collects data from real users as they interact with… more »
Ranking
46th
out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
414
Comparisons
273
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
468
Rating
8.0
57th
out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
479
Comparisons
393
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA ASM
Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor
Learn More
Broadcom
OpenText
Overview

IT organizations require full visibility into business-critical applications regardless of where they're hosted in order to maintain service levels and proactively deal with issues before the end-user is impacted. CA App Synthetic Monitor uses synthetic transactions to provide performance insight for these applications no matter where they're hosted: outside the firewall, in the cloud or delivered via a managed service provider (MSP). Delivered as software as a service, CA App Synthetic Monitor provides end-to-end transaction response time visibility into cloud, mobile and traditional web applications using synthetic transactions delivered by a network of 95 monitoring stations across six continents, 48 countries, 93 cities and 15 time zones.

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

Review affected service level agreements.

BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

Sample Customers
Lexmark
United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company17%
Computer Software Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Wholesaler/Distributor9%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise67%
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA App Synthetic Monitor is ranked 46th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 3 reviews while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 57th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. CA App Synthetic Monitor is rated 7.0, while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CA App Synthetic Monitor writes "A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". CA App Synthetic Monitor is most compared with AppDynamics and Azure Monitor, whereas OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Datadog.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.