CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] vs Cedexis Impact [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] and Cedexis Impact [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Henry-Steinhauer
Use Cedexis Impact [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is an expensive solution and there is a single price to pay for licensing, with no options."
  • More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA ADA, Application Delivery Analysis, NetQoS SuperAgent
    Learn More
    Overview

    CA Application Delivery Analysis provides end-to-end response time monitoring at multiple component levels, giving Network Administrators the ability to quickly identify performance bottlenecks and to identify root cause in minutes as opposed to hours or days, resulting in up to 80% improvement in IT productivity and reduced Mean Time To Repair (MTTR).

    Cedexis Impact monitors resource performance and continuously correlate it to business KPIs. Impact helps you identify optimization opportunities that boost application performance, improve load times, and make your website or app indispensable. Impact features easy categorization and configuration management. Each Impact view can be easily filtered to expose the granular insights needed to identify optimization opportunities. Break down results by device type, geography, ISP, browser version, and other factors.
    Sample Customers
    ERGO
    Accor, Arte, Bets.com, DailyMotion, France Televisions, Gilead, Kingsoft Le Parisien, L'Oreal, Mozilla, Netlog, Pacnet, Government of France, Sita, Tumblr, Wargaming,net
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Cedexis Impact [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is rated 6.6, while Cedexis Impact [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] writes "Impressive ability to show potential slow downs. ". On the other hand, CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Cedexis Impact [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.