CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] vs Correlsense SharePath comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] and Correlsense SharePath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is an expensive solution and there is a single price to pay for licensing, with no options."
  • More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Views
    142
    Comparisons
    110
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA ADA, Application Delivery Analysis, NetQoS SuperAgent
    SharePath
    Learn More
    Overview

    CA Application Delivery Analysis provides end-to-end response time monitoring at multiple component levels, giving Network Administrators the ability to quickly identify performance bottlenecks and to identify root cause in minutes as opposed to hours or days, resulting in up to 80% improvement in IT productivity and reduced Mean Time To Repair (MTTR).

    SharePath enables IT to deliver on the promise of reliable and predictable business services delivery. SharePath tracks every individual transaction across all hops from a click in the browser through all the data center layers and back. SharePath's unique ability to analyze and model cross-tier transaction behavior based on that data ensures that if a performance problem occurs, you know immediately where, why, and who is affected.
    Sample Customers
    ERGO
    London South Bank University, First International Bank of Israel
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Correlsense SharePath is ranked 82nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is rated 6.6, while Correlsense SharePath is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] writes "Impressive ability to show potential slow downs. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Correlsense SharePath writes "It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications". CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Correlsense SharePath is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.