We performed a comparison between CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] and Dynatrace based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The most valuable feature is the fault management monitoring."
"The pricing is relatively low compared to other solutions in this area. I'd go so far as to say it's even significantly less than the competition."
"The stability is rock solid. We put a lot of stress on it."
"Provides bespoke dashboards and reports which help our business to grow."
"We scaled from 300 agents to 800 agents in six months. There were no issues at the server level, which is pretty good."
"The most valuable function is the ability to replay a customer session."
"It is a very good APM tool. There is a lot of thorough scanning of services and applications. It has got great monitoring features."
"It allows you to better utilize and focus your talent, and tell management that you are not only looking at problems, but how you can ultimately make the product better for the end user."
"It is a 100 percent stable solution...Dynatrace is a highly scalable product since it is a SaaS-based application."
"I would rate the technical support very well. They work with the inside their development teams to get us the best answer, as much as possible."
"The user interface needs improvement."
"My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances."
"Dashboarding and having different templates available for more business reporting, or even other metrics, would be useful."
"I was hands on in the setup of the solution. Initially, it seemed a little daunting."
"For AppMon, there is always room for improvement: charting, dashboarding, and user management."
"From the Dynatrace SaaS platform, they talk about the APIs. The approach they take is, "We create the APIs, you use them however you want." I like it, that gives us flexibility. But at the same time, if your company does not have a huge number of APM specialists, or it does not have the time and resources available to spend on these kind of technology developments, it would be helpful if there were out-of-the-box solutions available from the platform. I would certainly consider that, because that would make us go to market much faster, rather than redeveloping our own solutions based on those APIs."
"We have had problems with our middle layer application implementation."
"Dynatrace has APIs, but they are unfriendly APIs. If they were friendly like Splunk or Sumo Logic had, we might integrate that same data on a single webpage, then start showing these internally."
"Need better mapping to true business service rather than purely technical monitoring."
"The web interface, in some cases, is a little ambiguous to use."
More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 340 reviews. CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is rated 6.6, while Dynatrace is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] writes "Impressive ability to show potential slow downs. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.