CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] vs OpenText Diagnostics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] and OpenText Diagnostics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The pricing is relatively low compared to other solutions in this area. I'd go so far as to say it's even significantly less than the competition.""The most valuable feature is the fault management monitoring."

More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pros →

"For banking and telecom solutions, it's been quite useful.""The diagnostics and configuration are the solution's most valuable aspects.""The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Diagnostics is the information reported from an application that has timed out. For example, when you're Googling, or you're booking a ticket for Burj Khalifa here, the longest tower in the world, there are situations where the system can time out. There are times when you might not receive a response on the payment gateway or you are not able to find the reservation. The customer only receives the information that the session has timed out."

More OpenText Diagnostics Pros →

Cons
"My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances.""The user interface needs improvement."

More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Cons →

"The GUI and metrics of Micro Focus Diagnostics can be improved. The metrics the solution gathers can be limited and could be enhanced by giving more details.""The interface is very old, and not very user-friendly. Most of our clients don't like the UI.""The interface could be more user friendly."

More OpenText Diagnostics Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is an expensive solution and there is a single price to pay for licensing, with no options."
  • More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Views
    579
    Comparisons
    389
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    374
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA ADA, Application Delivery Analysis, NetQoS SuperAgent
    Micro Focus Diagnostics, MF Diagnostics
    Learn More
    Overview

    CA Application Delivery Analysis provides end-to-end response time monitoring at multiple component levels, giving Network Administrators the ability to quickly identify performance bottlenecks and to identify root cause in minutes as opposed to hours or days, resulting in up to 80% improvement in IT productivity and reduced Mean Time To Repair (MTTR).

    Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.
    Sample Customers
    ERGO
    BSkyB, Alior Bank
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Educational Organization8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while OpenText Diagnostics is ranked 33rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 4 reviews. CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is rated 6.6, while OpenText Diagnostics is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] writes "Impressive ability to show potential slow downs. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Diagnostics writes "Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training". CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText Diagnostics is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Broadcom DX Application Performance Management and Accedian Skylight.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.