• Home
  • CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] vs. POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring

CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] vs POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] and POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Henry-Steinhauer
Impressive ability to show potential slow downs.
Anonymous User
Gives us clear information on what is going wrong and where we need to focus to improve our applications, but it...
Gives us clear information on what is going wrong and where we need to focus to improve our applications. Real added value in our IT internal and... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is an expensive solution and there is a single price to pay for licensing, with no options."

    • More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    65th
    out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Views
    201
    Comparisons
    183
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA ADA, Application Delivery Analysis, NetQoS SuperAgent
    Nudge APM
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    ATAKAMA Technologies
    Overview

    CA Application Delivery Analysis provides end-to-end response time monitoring at multiple component levels, giving Network Administrators the ability to quickly identify performance bottlenecks and to identify root cause in minutes as opposed to hours or days, resulting in up to 80% improvement in IT productivity and reduced Mean Time To Repair (MTTR).

    The APM solution fully integrated with Real End User Monitoring and Synthetic Monitoring.

    Be able to monitor and diagnose quickly any application performance slowdown with a fully integrated APM and User Monitoring solution. Start from the End User eyes and application response time monitoring down to code analysis and diagnostic. It has never been so easy to discover the root cause of any slow response time.

    With few clics you can drill down and fix a problem to avoid any end user dissatisfaction or complain. APM is now integrated with End User Monitoring for a full understanding of what is happening. You can now monitor End User Satisfaction in production.

    Sample Customers
    ERGO
    Bank and Insurance : Crédit Agricole, CDC (Caisse des dépots et consignations), ACMS (French healthcare insurance), Service : Unibail Rodamco, Elis, Public : CNIL, Mairie de Paris, AESN, HAS, EPIDE, Ministere Education Nationale Software : Jalma, Neoxia, AFI, Traceone, Infinancials, Telecom operator : NordNet Media : Les Echos,
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is ranked 65th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is rated 6.6, while POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] writes "Impressive ability to show potential slow downs. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring writes "Gives us clear information on what is going wrong and where we need to focus to improve our applications, but it lacks automatic alerting". CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is most compared with , whereas POWERHOUSE Application Performance Monitoring is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.