We performed a comparison between CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] and SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The most valuable feature is the fault management monitoring."
"The pricing is relatively low compared to other solutions in this area. I'd go so far as to say it's even significantly less than the competition."
"As it offers enterprise solutions, it has all the essential features for business."
"It is great at telling you if your devices are working and it keeps an eye on your network's overall performance."
"What my organization likes best about SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer is its easy deployment. It's also well-integrated in terms of monitoring because my organization also uses a SolarWinds solution for monitoring. You can connect SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer directly to that monitoring tool to get information. My organization also finds the default graphs that appear before the configuration in SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer very useful."
"SolarWinds has improved our organization because whenever a device is down, we get an alert."
"With SolarWinds, we are now able to accurately gauge bandwidth consumption."
"It doesn't cost too much."
"The monitoring is perfect, showing you the details for the utilization of resources and network bandwidth."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its traffic analysis."
"The user interface needs improvement."
"My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances."
"It is a scalable solution, but it is costly to scale. Therefore, I would rate scalability at eight out of ten."
"The problem is that SolarWinds is trying to bolt in too much and that can leave bugs, which you have to then sort out, leaving the product unstable. SolarWinds needs to try and slow down and improve the stability of the product, as opposed to bringing out more and more features."
"Technical support could be improved with quicker response times."
"An area for improvement in SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer is the dashboarding. The user interface also has room for improvement because it's currently clunky."
"I would like to see better customization capabilities."
"The Atlas module that is used for building the network map is very bad."
"The price of the solution is a bit high for our clients. They should consider adjusting their price model."
"It's scalable, but it could be simplified because it's not completely easy."
More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer is ranked 6th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 34 reviews. CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is rated 6.6, while SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] writes "Impressive ability to show potential slow downs. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer writes "Displays traffic visibility and efficient traffic flows". CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is most compared with , whereas SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer is most compared with ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Zabbix, SolarWinds NPM and Darktrace.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
